Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The clinical results of the Turnbull–Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review
by
Grégoire, R. C.
, Bouchard, A.
, Milot, H.
, Hallet, J.
, Drolet, S.
, Desrosiers, E.
in
Abdomen
/ Abdominal Surgery
/ Anal Canal - surgery
/ Anastomosis, Surgical - methods
/ Bibliographic literature
/ Colon - surgery
/ Colonic Diseases - surgery
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Colorectal Surgery
/ Feces
/ Gastroenterology
/ Grey literature
/ Humans
/ Laparoscopy
/ Laparotomy
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Meetings
/ Morbidity
/ Observational studies
/ Ostomy
/ Postoperative Complications
/ Proctology
/ Radiation therapy
/ Rectal Diseases - surgery
/ Review
/ Surgery
/ Surgical anastomosis
/ Surgical techniques
/ Survival Analysis
/ Systematic review
2014
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The clinical results of the Turnbull–Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review
by
Grégoire, R. C.
, Bouchard, A.
, Milot, H.
, Hallet, J.
, Drolet, S.
, Desrosiers, E.
in
Abdomen
/ Abdominal Surgery
/ Anal Canal - surgery
/ Anastomosis, Surgical - methods
/ Bibliographic literature
/ Colon - surgery
/ Colonic Diseases - surgery
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Colorectal Surgery
/ Feces
/ Gastroenterology
/ Grey literature
/ Humans
/ Laparoscopy
/ Laparotomy
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Meetings
/ Morbidity
/ Observational studies
/ Ostomy
/ Postoperative Complications
/ Proctology
/ Radiation therapy
/ Rectal Diseases - surgery
/ Review
/ Surgery
/ Surgical anastomosis
/ Surgical techniques
/ Survival Analysis
/ Systematic review
2014
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The clinical results of the Turnbull–Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review
by
Grégoire, R. C.
, Bouchard, A.
, Milot, H.
, Hallet, J.
, Drolet, S.
, Desrosiers, E.
in
Abdomen
/ Abdominal Surgery
/ Anal Canal - surgery
/ Anastomosis, Surgical - methods
/ Bibliographic literature
/ Colon - surgery
/ Colonic Diseases - surgery
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Colorectal Surgery
/ Feces
/ Gastroenterology
/ Grey literature
/ Humans
/ Laparoscopy
/ Laparotomy
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Meetings
/ Morbidity
/ Observational studies
/ Ostomy
/ Postoperative Complications
/ Proctology
/ Radiation therapy
/ Rectal Diseases - surgery
/ Review
/ Surgery
/ Surgical anastomosis
/ Surgical techniques
/ Survival Analysis
/ Systematic review
2014
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The clinical results of the Turnbull–Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review
Journal Article
The clinical results of the Turnbull–Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review
2014
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Turnbull and Cutait described abdominoperineal pull-through followed by delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCA) in 1961. DCA could reduce anastomotic leaks, pelvic morbidity and use of stomas. Strong evidence about its clinical benefits is still lacking. This systematic review examined the clinical outcomes of DCA for the treatment of malignant or benign colorectal conditions. A systematic search of electronic medical databases was conducted. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcome was pelvic morbidity (anastomotic leak, pelvic abscess or sepsis, use of stoma). Fecal continence and survival data were also analyzed. From 1,251 citations, we included seven observational studies including 1,124 patients. All included studies were considered at high risk of bias. Two studies comparing DCA with immediate anastomosis reported a significant decrease in anastomotic leak, and pelvic abscess or sepsis. Low rates of pelvic morbidity were reported in the other five studies: anastomotic leak 0–7 %, pelvic abscess 0–11.8 % and pelvic sepsis 6.8–10 %. Rates of permanent stoma after DCA were low in six studies (1–6 %), with one study reporting an incidence of 25 %. Fecal continence was reported as satisfying in all studies. No differences were observed in a comparative setting. Survival data were reported in four studies. Clinical heterogeneity and methodological issues precluded meta-analysis. Based on retrospective evidence, DCA offers a low rate of anastomotic leak, pelvic morbidity and use of stoma, with reasonable fecal continence. Results are encouraging, but prospective studies are needed for comparison with standard of care.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.