Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Legal pathology: Evaluating the High Court on expert evidence
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Legal pathology: Evaluating the High Court on expert evidence
Do you wish to request the book?
Legal pathology: Evaluating the High Court on expert evidence
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Legal pathology: Evaluating the High Court on expert evidence
2025
Overview
This article explains why the application of admissibility rules to the opinion of a forensic pathologist in 'Lang v The Queen' ('Lang') (and forensic pathologists in 'Velevski v The Queen', and indirectly an anatomist in 'Honeysett v The Queen') seems insufficiently attentive to the expressed need for specialised knowledge and, inextricably, the actual abilities of those recognised as expert witnesses. The article explains why legal practitioners and judges should carefully attend to 'specialised knowledge', and treat independent evidence supporting specific abilities (in Lang, being able to discriminate between self-inflicted stab wounds and stab wounds inflicted by others) as a form of 'specialised knowledge'. Notwithstanding obiter in 'Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar', it cautions against placing too much reliance on training, formal qualifications, general experience, and past legal practice. Courts, in particular, should be more sceptical about opinion evidence adduced by parties (especially prosecutors in criminal proceedings), the abilities of trial lawyers, judges and other fact-finders, as well as the effectiveness of trial safeguards and appeals.
Publisher
University of Queensland Press,TC Beirne School of Law, University of Queensland,University of Queensland, TC Beirne School of Law
Subject
