Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clinical examination remains more important than anorectal function tests to identify treatable conditions in women with constipation
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Clinical examination remains more important than anorectal function tests to identify treatable conditions in women with constipation
Do you wish to request the book?
Clinical examination remains more important than anorectal function tests to identify treatable conditions in women with constipation
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Clinical examination remains more important than anorectal function tests to identify treatable conditions in women with constipation
2013
Overview
Introduction and hypothesis
Many women with chronic constipation are referred for anorectal function tests (AFT) when they fail initial conservative treatment with lifestyle advice and laxatives. Our goal was to prospectively investigate the diagnostic potential of AFT in women with constipation in order to identify treatable conditions.
Methods
Between May 2003 and June 2011, all women with constipation referred to our tertiary referral center completed a questionnaire regarding their perianal complaints and underwent physical examination and were evaluated according to our AFT protocol, including anorectal manometry (ARM) and anal endosonography.
Results
One hundred and thirteen women were referred and classified as having idiopathic constipation (
n
= 100), neurological disorder (
n
= 8), or others (
n
= 5). Of the 100 women with idiopathic constipation, clinical examination identified 25 (25 %) with hypertonia of the pelvic floor (dyssynergic pelvic floor) and 15 (15 %) with a rectocele. In 37/100 women also complaining of impaired evacuation, the yield of rectocele was 15 (41 %) and of hypertonia 5 (14 %). Women with hypertonia were younger (40 vs. 51 years;
P
= 0.002) and had no rectoceles identified (
P
= 0.02), and fewer women could relax during straining on ARM (56 % vs. 92 %;
P
< 0.001) compared with women without pelvic hypertonia. Other ARM measurements showed no differences between women with evacuation disorders, rectoceles, or hypertonia. Anal endosonography showed no internal sphincter hypertrophia.
Conclusion
Potentially treatable conditions, such as rectocele and pelvic floor hypertonia, are found on clinical examination in 40 % of women with idiopathic constipation. Impaired evacuation is associated with the presence of a rectocele. AFT contributes little and should be reserved for selected cases.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag,Springer Nature B.V
