Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Specialty-specific Evaluation of Virtual care Outcomes: A retrospective QUality and safety analysis (S-EVOQUe)
by
Langmann, Cailin
, Battaglia, Frank
, Drossos, Alex
, Miller, Paul
, Gayowsky, Anastasia
, Clayton, Natasha
, Pardhan, Alim
, Mathews, Julie
, Mondoux, Shawn
, Grewal, Keerat
in
Ambulatory care
/ Codes
/ COVID-19
/ Datasets
/ Emergency medical care
/ Family physicians
/ Health services utilization
/ Hospitals
/ Immigration policy
/ Long term health care
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Mortality
/ Pandemics
/ Patients
/ People and places
/ Personal health
/ Primary care
/ Public policy
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Surgery
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Specialty-specific Evaluation of Virtual care Outcomes: A retrospective QUality and safety analysis (S-EVOQUe)
by
Langmann, Cailin
, Battaglia, Frank
, Drossos, Alex
, Miller, Paul
, Gayowsky, Anastasia
, Clayton, Natasha
, Pardhan, Alim
, Mathews, Julie
, Mondoux, Shawn
, Grewal, Keerat
in
Ambulatory care
/ Codes
/ COVID-19
/ Datasets
/ Emergency medical care
/ Family physicians
/ Health services utilization
/ Hospitals
/ Immigration policy
/ Long term health care
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Mortality
/ Pandemics
/ Patients
/ People and places
/ Personal health
/ Primary care
/ Public policy
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Surgery
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Specialty-specific Evaluation of Virtual care Outcomes: A retrospective QUality and safety analysis (S-EVOQUe)
by
Langmann, Cailin
, Battaglia, Frank
, Drossos, Alex
, Miller, Paul
, Gayowsky, Anastasia
, Clayton, Natasha
, Pardhan, Alim
, Mathews, Julie
, Mondoux, Shawn
, Grewal, Keerat
in
Ambulatory care
/ Codes
/ COVID-19
/ Datasets
/ Emergency medical care
/ Family physicians
/ Health services utilization
/ Hospitals
/ Immigration policy
/ Long term health care
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Mortality
/ Pandemics
/ Patients
/ People and places
/ Personal health
/ Primary care
/ Public policy
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Surgery
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Specialty-specific Evaluation of Virtual care Outcomes: A retrospective QUality and safety analysis (S-EVOQUe)
Journal Article
Specialty-specific Evaluation of Virtual care Outcomes: A retrospective QUality and safety analysis (S-EVOQUe)
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The objective was to compare specialty-specific 7- and 30-day outcomes between virtual care visits and in-person visits which occurred during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Using administrative data from provincial databases in Ontario, ambulatory care visits occurring virtually and in-person during specific timeframes within the pandemic were analyzed. Virtual care visits were matched with corresponding in-person visits based on multiple baseline patient characteristics. We assessed short-term patient outcomes at 7 and 30 days, including subsequent visits, hospital and ICU admissions, surgeries, and mortality and compared them using multivariate logistic regression. Odds ratios were calculated as measures of association between populations. For statistical significance, we used 99% confidence intervals to account for the increased likelihood of chance findings due to the multiple comparisons conducted. Overall, 9,340,519 visits were compared between populations using a 1:1 match on a 20% random sample of the available eligible visits. Over 70% of patients included were seen by a General Practitioner. With few exceptions and across almost all specialties, revisits, ED visits, admissions, ICU and OR use, and mortality were found to be more frequent for patients seen in person. When using the administrative data available to policy makers, there is no evidence to suggest that, in the short-term, virtual care is less safe than in person care. The causes for worse in-person outcomes are not yet clear although are likely related to the streaming of more acutely unwell patients towards in-person care.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.