Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Comparison of Implementation of Synchronization, Artificial Insemination and Sex-Skewed Semen on Reproductive Performance and Calving Distribution in Beef Herds
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Comparison of Implementation of Synchronization, Artificial Insemination and Sex-Skewed Semen on Reproductive Performance and Calving Distribution in Beef Herds
Do you wish to request the book?
A Comparison of Implementation of Synchronization, Artificial Insemination and Sex-Skewed Semen on Reproductive Performance and Calving Distribution in Beef Herds
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Comparison of Implementation of Synchronization, Artificial Insemination and Sex-Skewed Semen on Reproductive Performance and Calving Distribution in Beef Herds
2026
Overview
This study evaluated the implementation of reproductive technologies and their effects on pregnancy rates (PRs) and calving distribution. Producers (n = 11) were enrolled in Level 1 or 2 and subsequently transitioned to Level 2 or 3. Level 1: females were exposed to natural service (NS) only versus estrous synchronization (7d-CIDR) before NS (SynNS). Level 2: SynNS versus fixed-time artificial insemination (SynAI; 7d-CO-Synch + CIDR) with conventional semen. Level 3: conventional versus sex-skewed semen (FTAI-con and FTAI-sexed, respectively). Artificial insemination occurred 60–66 h post CIDR removal (SynAI; FTAI-con; FTAI-sexed) and bulls were introduced on d 0 (NS and SynNS) or 10–14 d post artificial insemination (SynAI; FTAI-con; FTAI-sexed). Breeding season PRs did not differ between treatments (p > 0.50). In Level 2, SynNS had greater 21 d PRs compared to SynAI (p < 0.01). For Level 3, FTAI-con had greater 21 d PRs compared to FTAI-sexed (p < 0.01). In Level 1, the proportion of cows that calved by day 14 was greater for SynNS compared to NS (p < 0.01). In Level 2, SynAI had a greater proportion calved by day 7 (p = 0.01); however, SynNS had a greater proportion calved by day 21 and 42 (p < 0.01). In Level 3, FTAI-con had a greater proportion calved by day 14 and 21 (p < 0.01) compared to FTAI-sexed. In conclusion, reproductive technologies altered the calving distribution with more calves born earlier.
Publisher
MDPI AG,Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
