Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Sex Differences Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair Using the Edge-to-Edge Technique
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Sex Differences Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair Using the Edge-to-Edge Technique
Do you wish to request the book?
Sex Differences Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair Using the Edge-to-Edge Technique
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Sex Differences Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair Using the Edge-to-Edge Technique
2024
Overview
Introduction: Tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is more prevalent among females. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) using the edge-to-edge technique represents an alternative to surgery in patients with severe TR and high surgical risk. This study aims to investigate sex differences among patients undergoing TTVR. Methods: All patients who underwent TTVR at our center were retrospectively included. We compared baseline characteristics, intra-hospital, and one-year outcomes between males and females. Results: A total of 105 consecutive patients underwent TTVR. Females were more prevalent in the study cohort (n = 63, 60%). Coronary artery disease (CAD) was more evident in males than females (71.4% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.016). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was also worse in males (48.8 ± 13.4 vs. 58 ± 6.8, p < 0.001). Other clinical characteristics were similar between both groups. The Success of the procedure (88.1% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.177) and intra-hospital mortality (4.8% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.255) were similar among males and females. At one-year follow-up, mortality was similar between both groups (24.3% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.863). Furthermore, hospitalization due to acute heart failure was also similar between both groups (40.5% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.768), as was a composite endpoint of death or hospitalization. In patients with successful procedures and who survived one year, TR severity was comparable between both groups. Conclusions: In our real-world cohort, more females underwent TTVR than males. No difference was observed in outcomes between males and females at one-year follow-up.
Publisher
MDPI AG,MDPI
Subject
