Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
NUISANCE, PLANNING AND HUMAN RIGHTS: THROWING AWAY THE EMERGENCY PARACHUTE
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
NUISANCE, PLANNING AND HUMAN RIGHTS: THROWING AWAY THE EMERGENCY PARACHUTE
Do you wish to request the book?
NUISANCE, PLANNING AND HUMAN RIGHTS: THROWING AWAY THE EMERGENCY PARACHUTE
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
NUISANCE, PLANNING AND HUMAN RIGHTS: THROWING AWAY THE EMERGENCY PARACHUTE
2020
Overview
THE idea that forms of legal control should not overlap has a considerable history. In the tort of negligence, for example, judges have long been fond of saying that the duty of care should not extend to situations covered by, for example, contract law, procedural law, financial regulation and human rights. Similar issues arise in the tort of nuisance, particularly potential overlaps with environmental regulation, especially planning controls. The problem the idea raises is a difficult one: overlapping liability adds to the complexity of the law and risks public and professional incomprehension; but it can also help to prevent deserving cases slipping through the net by adding an element of what engineers call \"redundancy\".
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
