Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
by
Parzer, Peter
, Fischer-Waldschmidt, Gloria
, Resch, Franz
, Kaess, Michael
, Edinger, Alexandra
, Brunner Romuald
in
Adolescents
/ Brief interventions
/ Child & adolescent psychiatry
/ Clinical research
/ Clinical significance
/ Clinical trials
/ Cognitive ability
/ Cognitive behavioral therapy
/ Cognitive therapy
/ Cost analysis
/ Groups
/ Injuries
/ Measurement
/ Psychotherapy
/ Recovery
/ Registration
/ Self destructive behavior
/ Self injury
/ Teenagers
/ Treatment methods
/ Treatment outcomes
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
by
Parzer, Peter
, Fischer-Waldschmidt, Gloria
, Resch, Franz
, Kaess, Michael
, Edinger, Alexandra
, Brunner Romuald
in
Adolescents
/ Brief interventions
/ Child & adolescent psychiatry
/ Clinical research
/ Clinical significance
/ Clinical trials
/ Cognitive ability
/ Cognitive behavioral therapy
/ Cognitive therapy
/ Cost analysis
/ Groups
/ Injuries
/ Measurement
/ Psychotherapy
/ Recovery
/ Registration
/ Self destructive behavior
/ Self injury
/ Teenagers
/ Treatment methods
/ Treatment outcomes
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
by
Parzer, Peter
, Fischer-Waldschmidt, Gloria
, Resch, Franz
, Kaess, Michael
, Edinger, Alexandra
, Brunner Romuald
in
Adolescents
/ Brief interventions
/ Child & adolescent psychiatry
/ Clinical research
/ Clinical significance
/ Clinical trials
/ Cognitive ability
/ Cognitive behavioral therapy
/ Cognitive therapy
/ Cost analysis
/ Groups
/ Injuries
/ Measurement
/ Psychotherapy
/ Recovery
/ Registration
/ Self destructive behavior
/ Self injury
/ Teenagers
/ Treatment methods
/ Treatment outcomes
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
Journal Article
Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Although nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a clinically significant behavior, evidence-based, specific, time-, and cost-effective treatment approaches are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of a brief cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy manual, the Cutting Down Programme (CDP), and treatment as usual (TAU) in the treatment of adolescent NSSI. We conducted a single-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT). Eligible participants were aged 12–17 years engaging in repetitive NSSI (at least 5 times within the past 6 months). We randomly allocated 74 participants to CDP (n = 37) or TAU (n = 37; in a 1:1 ratio). Outcome measures were administered before treatment (T0), directly after CDP or 4 months after baseline evaluation in the TAU group (T1), and another 6 months later (T2; primary endpoint). Primary outcome was a 50% reduction in NSSI frequency within the past 6 months at 10-month follow-up (T2). Regarding the primary outcome, there were no significant differences between the CDP (n = 26; 70.3%) and TAU group [n = 27; 73.0%; χ2(1) = 0.07; p = 0.797]; NSSI frequency within the past 6 months was significantly reduced at T2 [χ2(1) = 12.45; p < 0.001] with no between-group difference [χ2(1) = 0.14; p = 0.704]. However, we found a significant group x point of measurement interaction [χ2(2) = 7.78; p = 0.021] regarding NSSI within the last month indicating at T1. CDP was equally effective and achieved faster recovery compared to a significantly more intensive TAU in treating adolescent NSSI. The CDP could provide a brief and pragmatic first treatment within a stepped-care model for NSSI in routine clinical care.Clinical Trial Registration The trial was prospectively registered in the German Registry of Clinical Trials (https://www.drks.de; DRKS00003605) and is now complete.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.