Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Efficacy of montelukast in preventing seasonal recurrence of vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Efficacy of montelukast in preventing seasonal recurrence of vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children
Do you wish to request the book?
Efficacy of montelukast in preventing seasonal recurrence of vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Efficacy of montelukast in preventing seasonal recurrence of vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children
2022
Overview
BackgroundVernal keratoconjunctivitis is a chronic, seasonally exacerbated, allergic inflammation of the eye. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral montelukast in treating vernal keratoconjunctivitis in pediatric patients.MethodsThis is a 26-week, prospective, randomized, open-label study. Fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned to two groups—the treatment (montelukast) and control groups. At the beginning of the study, both the groups received topical loteprednol etabonate (0.1%) in tapering doses for a month, and topical olopatadine (0.1%) for the first 3 months. Symptoms and signs observed before and after treatment and assigned scores were studied. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in the mean score on the visual analog scale (VAS) for each subjective symptom. The secondary efficacy endpoint was change in the total score of objective signs.ResultsThe montelukast group showed clinically relevant improvements in the signs and symptoms of vernal keratoconjunctivitis, compared to the control group. There was considerable improvement in clinical signs. Individual symptoms such as redness, itching, foreign body sensation, and tearing showed significant improvement at 6 months follow-up. The gradual improvement in symptoms until the last visit was statistically more significant within montelukast group. Mean VAS score showed statistically significant improvement in itching (p < 0.001) and redness (p < 0.008) in montelukast group even at 3 months. No adverse events were reported in either group.ConclusionsMontelukast was found to be safe and effective as a long-term therapy to prevent relapse in moderate to severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis.
