Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis as Treatment for Incomplete Primary Antibody Deficiency
by
de Vries Esther
, Smits, Bas M
, ten Berge Ineke J M
, van der Flier Michiel
, Simon, Anna
, van Montfrans Joris M
, Sanders Lieke E A M
, Bredius Robbert G M
, Martin, van Hagen P
, Ellerbroek, Pauline M
, Kleine, Budde Ilona
, Rutgers Bram
, Marcel, van Deuren
, van Dissel Jaap T
, Nieuwhof, Chris
, Kuijpers, Taco W
in
Adverse events
/ Antibiotics
/ Cotrimoxazole
/ Disease prevention
/ Immunoglobulin G
/ Immunoglobulins
/ Infections
/ Patients
/ Persistent infection
/ Polysaccharides
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis as Treatment for Incomplete Primary Antibody Deficiency
by
de Vries Esther
, Smits, Bas M
, ten Berge Ineke J M
, van der Flier Michiel
, Simon, Anna
, van Montfrans Joris M
, Sanders Lieke E A M
, Bredius Robbert G M
, Martin, van Hagen P
, Ellerbroek, Pauline M
, Kleine, Budde Ilona
, Rutgers Bram
, Marcel, van Deuren
, van Dissel Jaap T
, Nieuwhof, Chris
, Kuijpers, Taco W
in
Adverse events
/ Antibiotics
/ Cotrimoxazole
/ Disease prevention
/ Immunoglobulin G
/ Immunoglobulins
/ Infections
/ Patients
/ Persistent infection
/ Polysaccharides
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis as Treatment for Incomplete Primary Antibody Deficiency
by
de Vries Esther
, Smits, Bas M
, ten Berge Ineke J M
, van der Flier Michiel
, Simon, Anna
, van Montfrans Joris M
, Sanders Lieke E A M
, Bredius Robbert G M
, Martin, van Hagen P
, Ellerbroek, Pauline M
, Kleine, Budde Ilona
, Rutgers Bram
, Marcel, van Deuren
, van Dissel Jaap T
, Nieuwhof, Chris
, Kuijpers, Taco W
in
Adverse events
/ Antibiotics
/ Cotrimoxazole
/ Disease prevention
/ Immunoglobulin G
/ Immunoglobulins
/ Infections
/ Patients
/ Persistent infection
/ Polysaccharides
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis as Treatment for Incomplete Primary Antibody Deficiency
Journal Article
Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis as Treatment for Incomplete Primary Antibody Deficiency
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundPatients with an IgG subclass deficiency (IgSD) ± specific polysaccharide antibody deficiency (SPAD) often present with recurrent infections. Previous retrospective studies have shown that prophylactic antibiotics (PA) and immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) can both be effective in preventing these infections; however, this has not been confirmed in a prospective study.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of PA and IRT in a randomized crossover trial.MethodsA total of 64 patients (55 adults and 9 children) were randomized (2:2) between two treatment arms. Treatment arm A began with 12 months of PA, and treatment arm B began with 12 months of IRT. After a 3-month bridging period with cotrimoxazole, the treatment was switched to 12 months of IRT and PA, respectively. The efficacy (measured by the incidence of infections) and proportion of related adverse events in the two arms were compared.ResultsThe overall efficacy of the two regimens did not differ (p = 0.58, two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test). A smaller proportion of patients suffered a related adverse event while using PA (26.8% vs. 60.3%, p < 0.0003, chi-squared test). Patients with persistent infections while using PA suffered fewer infections per year after switching to IRT (2.63 vs. 0.64, p < 0.01).ConclusionWe found comparable efficacy of IRT and PA in patients with IgSD ± SPAD. Patients with persistent infections during treatment with PA had less infections after switching to IRT.Clinical ImplicationGiven the costs and associated side-effects of IRT, it should be reserved for patients with persistent infections despite treatment with PA.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.