Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Based on Machine Learning and Regression Kriging
by
Pan, Jianjun
, Wei, Yuchen
, Lu, Wenhao
, Li, Zhaofu
, Zhu, Fubin
, Zhu, Changda
, Fang, Zihan
in
Accuracy
/ Analysis
/ Bayes Theorem
/ Cameras
/ Carbon
/ Carbon - chemistry
/ Carbon content
/ Digital mapping
/ digital soil mapping
/ ensemble model
/ Geostatistics
/ Machine Learning
/ machine learning (ML)
/ Mapping
/ Methods
/ Neural networks
/ regression kriging (RK)
/ Satellites
/ SOC
/ Soil - chemistry
/ soil genesis
/ Soil sciences
/ Soils
/ Spatial Analysis
/ Topography
/ Vegetation
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Based on Machine Learning and Regression Kriging
by
Pan, Jianjun
, Wei, Yuchen
, Lu, Wenhao
, Li, Zhaofu
, Zhu, Fubin
, Zhu, Changda
, Fang, Zihan
in
Accuracy
/ Analysis
/ Bayes Theorem
/ Cameras
/ Carbon
/ Carbon - chemistry
/ Carbon content
/ Digital mapping
/ digital soil mapping
/ ensemble model
/ Geostatistics
/ Machine Learning
/ machine learning (ML)
/ Mapping
/ Methods
/ Neural networks
/ regression kriging (RK)
/ Satellites
/ SOC
/ Soil - chemistry
/ soil genesis
/ Soil sciences
/ Soils
/ Spatial Analysis
/ Topography
/ Vegetation
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Based on Machine Learning and Regression Kriging
by
Pan, Jianjun
, Wei, Yuchen
, Lu, Wenhao
, Li, Zhaofu
, Zhu, Fubin
, Zhu, Changda
, Fang, Zihan
in
Accuracy
/ Analysis
/ Bayes Theorem
/ Cameras
/ Carbon
/ Carbon - chemistry
/ Carbon content
/ Digital mapping
/ digital soil mapping
/ ensemble model
/ Geostatistics
/ Machine Learning
/ machine learning (ML)
/ Mapping
/ Methods
/ Neural networks
/ regression kriging (RK)
/ Satellites
/ SOC
/ Soil - chemistry
/ soil genesis
/ Soil sciences
/ Soils
/ Spatial Analysis
/ Topography
/ Vegetation
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Based on Machine Learning and Regression Kriging
Journal Article
Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Based on Machine Learning and Regression Kriging
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In the last two decades, machine learning (ML) methods have been widely used in digital soil mapping (DSM), but the regression kriging (RK) model which combines the advantages of the ML and kriging methods has rarely been used in DSM. In addition, due to the limitation of a single-model structure, many ML methods have poor prediction accuracy in undulating terrain areas. In this study, we collected the SOC content of 115 soil samples in a hilly farming area with continuous undulating terrain. According to the theory of soil-forming factors in pedogenesis, we selected 10 topographic indices, 7 vegetation indices, and 2 soil indices as environmental covariates, and according to the law of geographical similarity, we used ML and RK methods to mine the relationship between SOC and environmental covariates to predict the SOC content. Four ensemble models—random forest (RF), Cubist, stochastic gradient boosting (SGB), and Bayesian regularized neural networks (BRNNs)—were used to fit the trend of SOC content, and the simple kriging (SK) method was used to interpolate the residuals of the ensemble models, and then the SOC and residual were superimposed to obtain the RK prediction result. Moreover, the 115 samples were divided into calibration and validation sets at a ratio of 80%, and the tenfold cross-validation method was used to fit the optimal parameters of the model. From the results of four ensemble models: RF performed best in the calibration set (R2c = 0.834) but poorly in the validation set (R2v = 0.362); Cubist had good accuracy and stability in both the calibration and validation sets (R2c = 0.693 and R2v = 0.445); SGB performed poorly (R2c = 0.430 and R2v = 0.336); and BRNN had the lowest accuracy (R2c = 0.323 and R2v = 0.282). The results showed that the R2 of the four RK models in the validation set were 0.718, 0.674, 0.724, and 0.625, respectively. Compared with the ensemble models without superimposed residuals, the prediction accuracy was improved by 0.356, 0.229, 0.388, and 0.343, respectively. In conclusion, Cubist has high prediction accuracy and generalization ability in areas with complex topography, and the RK model can make full use of trends and spatial structural factors that are not easy to mine by ML models, which can effectively improve the prediction accuracy. This provides a reference for soil survey and digital mapping in complex terrain areas.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.