Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Method validation and risk assessment for sulfonamides and tetracyclines in bees’ honey from Egypt, Libya and Saudi Arabia
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Method validation and risk assessment for sulfonamides and tetracyclines in bees’ honey from Egypt, Libya and Saudi Arabia
Do you wish to request the book?
Method validation and risk assessment for sulfonamides and tetracyclines in bees’ honey from Egypt, Libya and Saudi Arabia
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Method validation and risk assessment for sulfonamides and tetracyclines in bees’ honey from Egypt, Libya and Saudi Arabia
2023
Overview
Several studies worldwide have reported contamination of bees’ honey by antibiotics, which may pose a hazard to consumers’ health. The present study was thus established to: (1) introduce a validated multi-residue method for determining sulfonamides (SAs) and tetracyclines (TCs) in honey; and (2) characterize the potential risk due to the exposure to SAs and TCs in honey samples from Egypt, Libya, and Saudi Arabia. SAs and TCs were simultaneously extracted using solid-phase extraction and matrix solid phase dispersion methods. SAs and TCs were screened using HPLC–MS/MS and HPLC–DAD. The results confirmed detection limits for SAs and TCs by HPLC–MS/MS of 0.01 and 0.02–0.04 (ng g−1), respectively. The limits were 2.5–5.6 and 12.0–21.0 (ng g−1) for SAs and TCs by HPLC–DAD, respectively. The obtained accuracy rates were in the ranges of 83.07–86.93% and 86.90–91.19%, respectively, for SAs and TCs, with precision rates lower than 9.54%. Concerning the occurrence of antibiotics, the positive samples constituted 57.6%, 75%, and 77.7% of the Egyptian, Saudi Arabian, and Libyan samples, respectively. Notably, SAs antibiotics were the most prevalent in the Egyptian and Saudi Arabian samples; in contrast, TCs were the most dominant in Libya. Calculated parameters of risk assessment, concerning the aggregated exposure to SAs and TCs, showed no potential adverse effects from the exposure to contaminated honey in studied countries.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
