MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy
Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy
Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy
Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy
Journal Article

Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy

2015
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose Dual-site epicardial left ventricular (LV) pacing represents one strategy to improve acute cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. However, the feasibility of this approach in the longer term may be hindered by system complexity. We assessed chronic outcomes of patients receiving dual-site LV pacing. Methods Twenty patients with conventional CRT criteria were implanted with dual-site epicardial LV leads connected with bifurcating adapter. Mean energy required to capture the LV was calculated using threshold, impedance and pulse width. Values were obtained during implant and the following day. Follow-up data included lead parameters, ventricular arrhythmias and mortality. Results Nineteen patients had successful dual LV lead placement. Mean age was 66 ± 11 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 26 % ± 8 and 50 % ischemic etiology. Mean energy to capture the LV was 1.95 μJ for LV1 during implant, rising to 8.61 μJ at day 1, p  = 0.03. The energy required for LV2 was 2.37 μJ during implant, 11.55 μJ the next day, p  = 0.004. Eleven percent had LV2 turned off during the implant due to high thresholds and/or a worsened acute hemodynamic response. Eleven percent had LV2 turned off day 1 post implant due to inability to capture LV2 at maximum output. All remaining 15 patients had LV2 programmed off, with a mean time of 255 days from implant. Thirty-two percent of patients received ATP or shock, and sixteen percent died over a mean follow-up of 1271 days. Thirty-seven percent of patients required generator replacement with mean longevity of 42 months, far shorter than the suggested lifespan of the device (58 months), p  = 0.006. Conclusion Multisite epicardial LV lead placement may be acutely feasible and demonstrate beneficial hemodynamic results at implantation. Long-term delivery of this therapy is however problematic due to technical issues with pacing through the bifurcating adapter. This suggests the feasibility of this form of multisite CRT is limited.