Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Contrasting organizational responses to femicide in Mexico’s public health crisis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Contrasting organizational responses to femicide in Mexico’s public health crisis
Do you wish to request the book?
Contrasting organizational responses to femicide in Mexico’s public health crisis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Contrasting organizational responses to femicide in Mexico’s public health crisis
2025
Overview
Background
Femicide—the gender-motivated killing of women—remains an urgent public health and human rights crisis in Latin America. In Mexico, legal reforms have established formal mechanisms for prevention and response, yet implementation remains fragmented, particularly in regions marked by structural violence and institutional distrust. This study examines how femicide is conceptualized and addressed by both formal institutions and grassroots organizations in two distinct contexts: Mexico City and rural Michoacán.
Methods
Drawing on 64 in-depth interviews and participant observations conducted between 2022 and 2024, this qualitative study employs a comparative case study design to explore how divergent organizational frameworks, political conditions, and cultural logics shape femicide response. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in discourse, action, and collaboration across formal and community-based actors.
Results
Findings reveal two fundamentally different logics of femicide response. Formal institutions emphasize legal harmonization, training protocols, and policy compliance metrics—reflecting a technocratic model of prevention aligned with bureaucratic governance. Grassroots actors, by contrast, center relational care, symbolic resistance, and immediate community mobilization. These differences are not merely operational, but epistemic: institutional actors often devalue lived experience and emotional labor, while grassroots actors articulate survivor-defined safety, cultural legitimacy, and trust as central to prevention. In rural and high-impunity regions, community-led responses often function as the only reliable form of protection and accountability.
Conclusions
Femicide prevention frameworks in Mexico must move beyond symbolic gestures of inclusion and begin to reckon with the structural exclusion of grassroots knowledge and labor. Meaningful response requires a shift in power and priorities—one that values community knowledge, centers survivor-defined metrics of safety and trust, and explores models of shared governance in contexts where institutional systems are distrusted or absent. In such settings, grassroots responses are not peripheral—they are essential.
