MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clinical evaluation of a novel Mologic malaria Plasmodium falciparum LDH-dependent lateral flow rapid diagnostic test diagnostic accuracy: a cross-sectional study, Sudan
Clinical evaluation of a novel Mologic malaria Plasmodium falciparum LDH-dependent lateral flow rapid diagnostic test diagnostic accuracy: a cross-sectional study, Sudan
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Clinical evaluation of a novel Mologic malaria Plasmodium falciparum LDH-dependent lateral flow rapid diagnostic test diagnostic accuracy: a cross-sectional study, Sudan
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Clinical evaluation of a novel Mologic malaria Plasmodium falciparum LDH-dependent lateral flow rapid diagnostic test diagnostic accuracy: a cross-sectional study, Sudan
Clinical evaluation of a novel Mologic malaria Plasmodium falciparum LDH-dependent lateral flow rapid diagnostic test diagnostic accuracy: a cross-sectional study, Sudan

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Clinical evaluation of a novel Mologic malaria Plasmodium falciparum LDH-dependent lateral flow rapid diagnostic test diagnostic accuracy: a cross-sectional study, Sudan
Clinical evaluation of a novel Mologic malaria Plasmodium falciparum LDH-dependent lateral flow rapid diagnostic test diagnostic accuracy: a cross-sectional study, Sudan
Journal Article

Clinical evaluation of a novel Mologic malaria Plasmodium falciparum LDH-dependent lateral flow rapid diagnostic test diagnostic accuracy: a cross-sectional study, Sudan

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Malaria diagnosis by Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) is challenged by the newly emerging histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) gene deletion in the Plasmodium falciparum species. The alternative lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-dependent RDTs suffer from low sensitivity, and improvement in the sensitivity of LDH RDTs is the cornerstone for detecting the (HRP2) gene deletion species. This study aimed to evaluate a novel, improved Mologic Malaria Pf LDH-dependent RDT for the diagnosis of P. falciparum malaria in partnership with the Foundation for Innovative Diagnostics (FIND), Switzerland. Methods This is a descriptive cross-sectional study evaluating the clinical performance of the improved Mologic LDH- RDT in two rural sites in Khartoum state, Sudan. Five hundred patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of malaria in the two primary care health centres were enrolled after signing informed consent. Finger-prick blood was collected for examination with microscopy, the index Mologic LDH RDT, the comparator RDT, and preparation of DBS for PCR, the reference method. Results The mean age of the study subjects was 31 years, ranging from 5 to 80 years. Out of 500 patients, 210 (42%) were positive by PCR, 200 (40%) by expert microscopy, 193 (38.6%) by index Mologic LDH RDT, and 199 (39.8%) by comparator RDT. The sensitivities of microscopy, index RDT, and comparator RDT were 95.24% (95% CI, 91.4–97.6), 91.9% (95% CI, 87.3–95.2), and 93.81% (95% CI, 89.6–96.6), respectively. All tests were nearly 100% specific for the detection of P. falciparum parasites. The concordance test showed almost perfect agreement with the reference test ( κ  = 0.929). Six samples were P. falciparum HRP2 Ag negative and were detected by Mologic LDH RDT. A limitation of this study is that there is no confirmation of HRP2 gene deletion by PCR. Conclusion The novel Mologic LDH RDT showed performance concordant with standard expert microscopy and the comparator HRP2-based RDT. The sensitivity of the Mologic LDH RDT makes it suitable for the clinical management of P. falciparum HRP2 negative malaria.

MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks