Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Air trapping in usual interstitial pneumonia pattern at CT: prevalence and prognosis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Air trapping in usual interstitial pneumonia pattern at CT: prevalence and prognosis
Do you wish to request the book?
Air trapping in usual interstitial pneumonia pattern at CT: prevalence and prognosis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Air trapping in usual interstitial pneumonia pattern at CT: prevalence and prognosis
2018
Overview
This study was conducted to evaluate the presence of air trapping in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) (non-IPF), showing the radiological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Retrospectively, we included 69 consecutive patients showing the typical UIP pattern on computed tomography (CT), and 15 final diagnosis of IPF with CT pattern “inconsistent with UIP” due to extensive air trapping. Air trapping at CT was assessed qualitatively by visual analysis and quantitatively by automated-software. In the quantitative analysis, significant air trapping was defined as >6% of voxels with attenuation between −950 to −856 HU on expiratory CT (expiratory air trapping index [ATIexp]) or an expiratory to inspiratory (E/I) ratio of mean lung density >0.87. The sample comprised 51 (60.7%) cases of IPF and 33 (39.3%) cases of non-IPF ILD. Most patients did not have air trapping (E/I ratio ≤0.87, n = 53, [63.1%]; ATIexp ≤6%, n = 45, [53.6%]). Air trapping in the upper lobes was the only variable distinguishing IPF from non-IPF ILD (prevalence, 3.9% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, air trapping is common in patients with ILDs showing a UIP pattern on CT, as determined by qualitative and quantitative evaluation, and should not be considered to be inconsistent with UIP. On subjective visual assessment, air trapping in the upper lobes was associated with a non-IPF diagnoses.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group
