MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Predictive significance of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte for cytomegalovirus infection in infants less than 3 months: A retrospective study
Predictive significance of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte for cytomegalovirus infection in infants less than 3 months: A retrospective study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Predictive significance of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte for cytomegalovirus infection in infants less than 3 months: A retrospective study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Predictive significance of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte for cytomegalovirus infection in infants less than 3 months: A retrospective study
Predictive significance of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte for cytomegalovirus infection in infants less than 3 months: A retrospective study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Predictive significance of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte for cytomegalovirus infection in infants less than 3 months: A retrospective study
Predictive significance of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte for cytomegalovirus infection in infants less than 3 months: A retrospective study
Journal Article

Predictive significance of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte for cytomegalovirus infection in infants less than 3 months: A retrospective study

2022
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the hematological parameters in the identification of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in infants less than 3 months. Methods A single‐center, observational study of infants with CMV infection was conducted retrospectively. Routine blood parameters were analyzed in CMV‐infected infants and controls with no differences of birthweight, sex, gestational age at birth, and date of admission. Furthermore, receiver‐operating curve was used to assess the predictive value of the hematological parameters for CMV infection. Results One hundred ninety cases with CMV infection were studied retrospectively. Compared with the control group, there were significant differences in the white blood cell count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, platelet count, hemoglobin, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte (NLR), platelet‐to‐lymphocyte (PLR), and lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte (LMR) for the patients with CMV infection (all p < 0.001). The best predicted values for CMV infection based on the area under the curve (AUC) were NLR and PLR with the optimal cut‐off value of 0.28 and 65.36. NLR‐PLR score of 0, 1, or 2 based on an elevated NLR (>0.28), an elevated PLR (>65.36), or both. NLR‐PLR score for CMV infection prediction yielded higher AUC values than NLR or PLR alone (0.760 vs. 0.689, 0.689; p < 0.001). Conclusions The NLR combined with PLR is potentially useful as a predictor of CMV infection in infants less than 3 months. NLR‐PLR score for CMV infection prediction yielded higher AUC values than NLR or PLR alone (0.760 vs. 0.689, 0.689; p < 0.001). Therefore, the NLR combined with PLR is potentially useful as a predictor of CMV infection in infants less than 3 months.