Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China
Do you wish to request the book?
Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Can digital technology promote sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence from urban China
2023
Overview
In the face of increasing global unsustainable risks such as poverty, hunger, and pollution. Building sustainable agriculture (SA) in the digital age is a fundamental task for human survival. Based on the coupled coordination perspective, this paper constructs an SA system that takes into account more stakeholders by considering poverty alleviation and income increase (PI), food security (FS), and green agriculture (GA) as subsystems. The impact of digital technology on SA is systematically analyzed through data from 276 prefecture-level and above cities in China from 2005 to 2020. The study shows that digital technology has a significant upgrading effect on SA and its subsystems. And digital technology is more likely to promote SA in the developed eastern region and peripheral cities. Moreover, agricultural productivity and labor productivity play a mediating mechanism in the process of digital technology for SA. Digital financial inclusion fuels the high input process of digital technology for incentivizing SA, PI, and GA, but it cannot affect the highly technical process of digital farming. Further research found that the incentives of digital technology for SA and GA are characterized by the nonlinear characteristic of increasing marginal effects. Due to the second digital divide, there is a U-shaped incentive process of digital technology for PI to fall and then rise. Finally, the spillover nature of digital technology leads to spatial spillovers in its contribution to SA development.
