MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Intra-aortic balloon pump after VA-ECMO reduces mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an analysis of the Chinese extracorporeal life support registry
Intra-aortic balloon pump after VA-ECMO reduces mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an analysis of the Chinese extracorporeal life support registry
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Intra-aortic balloon pump after VA-ECMO reduces mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an analysis of the Chinese extracorporeal life support registry
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Intra-aortic balloon pump after VA-ECMO reduces mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an analysis of the Chinese extracorporeal life support registry
Intra-aortic balloon pump after VA-ECMO reduces mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an analysis of the Chinese extracorporeal life support registry

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Intra-aortic balloon pump after VA-ECMO reduces mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an analysis of the Chinese extracorporeal life support registry
Intra-aortic balloon pump after VA-ECMO reduces mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an analysis of the Chinese extracorporeal life support registry
Journal Article

Intra-aortic balloon pump after VA-ECMO reduces mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an analysis of the Chinese extracorporeal life support registry

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background The role of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) combined with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of applying IABP for left ventricle (LV) unloading after VA-ECMO on reducing mortality in patients with CS. Methods Data from 5,492 consecutive patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO between January 2017 and July 2023 were collected from the CSECLS registry. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, survival on VA-ECMO, and various complications. The association between the application of IABP after VA-ECMO and in-hospital outcomes was assessed. Results Among 5,492 patients undergoing VA-ECMO (mean age 54.7 ± 15.1 years, 3,917 [71.3%] male), 832 (15.1%) received IABP after VA-ECMO. Before VA-ECMO, a higher incidence of cardiac intervention (13.9% vs. 16.7%) and myocardial infarction (12.0% vs. 14.8%) (all P  < 0.05) was seen in the IABP after VA-ECMO group. In this cohort, the IABP after VA-ECMO group had a lower in-hospital mortality (52.5% vs. 48.0%, P  = 0.017) and a higher survival rate on VA-ECMO (75.4% vs. 79.4%, P  = 0.014). On multivariate modeling, the use of IABP after VA-ECMO was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio[aOR], 0.823 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.686–0.987]; P  = 0.035) and on-support mortality (aOR, 0.828 [95% CI, 0.688–0.995]; P  = 0.044). However, the use of IABP after VA-ECMO was also associated with an increased incidence of complications, including mechanical (aOR: 1.905, [95% CI, 1.278–2.839]; P  = 0.002), bleeding (aOR: 1.371, [95% CI, 1.092–1.721]; P  = 0.007), renal (aOR: 1.252, [95% CI, 1.041–1.505]; P  = 0.017), and pulmonary (aOR: 1.768, [95% CI, 1.446–2.163]; P  < 0.001). Conclusion In this multicenter retrospective study, the use of IABP after VA-ECMO was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with CS. These findings suggest that IABP may offer advantages for LV unloading in patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO, but further validation through randomized controlled trials is warranted to better understand the balance of risks and benefits.