Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment with Breath-Hold Functional MRI in Patients with Moyamoya Angiopathy: Which Time Period to Analyze?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment with Breath-Hold Functional MRI in Patients with Moyamoya Angiopathy: Which Time Period to Analyze?
Do you wish to request the book?
Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment with Breath-Hold Functional MRI in Patients with Moyamoya Angiopathy: Which Time Period to Analyze?
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment with Breath-Hold Functional MRI in Patients with Moyamoya Angiopathy: Which Time Period to Analyze?
2026
Overview
Background/Objectives: Quantifying cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is essential for stroke risk assessment in patients with Moyamoya Angiopathy (MMA). Breath-hold functional MRI (bh-fMRI) is an easily implementable method to assess CVR. Determining the optimal time period of the BOLD signal for analyzing the best bh-fMRI data quality remains an open question. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 46 bh-fMRI data sets of MMA patients was conducted. The percentage BOLD signal changes were evaluated at different time periods (time point of the maximum cerebellar signal peak (TPcereb. max) ± 0 s, TPcereb. max ± 1 s, TPcereb. max ± 2 s, TPcereb. max ± 3 s, TPcereb. max ± 4 s, TPcereb. max ± 5 s). The agreement between the bh-fMRI maps and [15O]water PET maps was independently and consensually rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 2 = moderate, 3 = good, 4 = excellent) and compared with the Friedman test. The inter-rater agreement was calculated separately for each time period using quadratic weighted Cohen’s kappa κw. Results: The selected time period had a significant impact on the agreement between bh-fMRI and [15O]water PET (χ2(5) = 79.448, p < 0.001, W = 0.345). Short time periods of TPcereb.max ± 0 s or TPcereb.max ±1 s demonstrated the highest level of concordance between bh-fMRI and [15O]water PET (median = 3.5 for TPcereb.max ± 0 s; median = 3 for TPcereb.max ± 1 s, modus = 4 in both cases). The agreement between bh-fMRI and [15O]water PET was significantly higher when evaluating time periods of TPcereb.max ± 0 s than when evaluating all time periods ≥ TPcereb. max ± 2 s. The inter-rater agreement was almost perfect for all time periods except one (TPcereb. max ± 1 s). Conclusions: Short time periods should be selected when evaluating CVR with bh-fMRI, as this study suggests a high level of validity in comparison to [15O]water PET.
Publisher
MDPI AG,Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
