Journal Article

What is considered deception in experimental economics?

van de Ven, Jeroen, Charness, Gary, Samek, Anya

2022

Overview

In experimental economics there is a norm against using deception. But precisely what constitutes deception is unclear. While there is a consensus view that providing false information is not permitted, there are also “gray areas” with respect to practices that omit information or are misleading without an explicit lie being told. In this paper, we report the results of a large survey among experimental economists and students concerning various specific gray areas. We find that there is substantial heterogeneity across respondent choices. The data indicate a perception that costs and benefits matter, so that such practices might in fact be appropriate when the topic is important and there is no other way to gather data. Compared to researchers, students have different attitudes about some of the methods in the specific scenarios that we ask about. Few students express awareness of the no-deception policy at their schools. We also briefly discuss some potential alternatives to “gray-area” deception, primarily based on suggestions offered by respondents.

• Publisher: Springer US,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Behavioral/Experimental Economics / Deception / Economic theory / Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods / Economics / Economics and Finance / Experimental economics / Experimental methods / Game Theory / Microeconomics / Operations Research/Decision Theory / Original Paper / Respondents / Social and Behav. Sciences / Student attitudes / Students