Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Quantitative assessment of acetabular bone defects: A study of 50 computed tomography data sets
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Quantitative assessment of acetabular bone defects: A study of 50 computed tomography data sets
Do you wish to request the book?
Quantitative assessment of acetabular bone defects: A study of 50 computed tomography data sets
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Quantitative assessment of acetabular bone defects: A study of 50 computed tomography data sets
2019
Overview
Acetabular bone defect quantification and classification is still challenging. The objectives of this study were to suggest and define parameters for the quantification of acetabular bone defects, to analyze 50 bone defects and to present the results and correlations between the defined parameters.
The analysis was based on CT-data of pelvises with acetabular bone defects and their reconstruction via a statistical shape model. Based on this data, bone volume loss and new bone formation were analyzed in four sectors (cranial roof, anterior column, posterior column, and medial wall). In addition, ovality of the acetabulum, lateral center-edge angle, implant migration, and presence of wall defects were analyzed and correlations between the different parameters were assessed.
Bone volume loss was found in all sectors and was multidirectional in most cases. Highest relative bone volume loss was found in the medial wall with median and [25, 75]-percentile values of 72.8 [50.6, 95.0] %. Ovality, given as the length to width ratio of the acetabulum, was 1.3 [1.1, 1.4] with a maximum of 2.0, which indicated an oval shape of the defect acetabulum. Lateral center-edge angle was 30.4° [21.5°, 40.4°], which indicated a wide range of roof coverage in the defect acetabulum. Total implant migration was 25.3 [14.8, 32.7] mm, whereby cranial was the most common direction. 49/50 cases showed a wall defect in at least one sector. It was observed that implant migration in cranial direction was associated with relative bone volume loss in cranial roof (R = 0.74) and ovality (R = 0.67).
Within this study, 50 pelvises with acetabular bone defects were successfully analyzed using six parameters. This could provide the basis for a novel classification concept which would represent a quantitative, objective, unambiguous, and reproducible classification approach for acetabular bone defects.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
/ Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging
/ Acetabulum - physiopathology
/ Aged
/ Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging
/ Bone and Bones - physiopathology
/ Bone Regeneration - physiology
/ Datasets
/ Defects
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging
/ Osteoporosis - physiopathology
/ Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging
/ Pelvic Bones - physiopathology
/ R&D
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Roofs
/ Skull
/ Surgeons
/ Surgery
