Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a Head-to-Head, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase IIIb Study
by
Cardo, Esther
, Coghill, David
, Hodgkins, Paul
, Anderson, Colleen S.
, Higgins, Nicholas
, Lyne, Andrew
, Bloomfield, Ralph
, Dittmann, Ralf W.
, Caballero, Beatriz
, Civil, Richard
, Nagy, Peter
in
Adolescent
/ Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects
/ Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - therapeutic use
/ Age
/ Atomoxetine Hydrochloride
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - epidemiology
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology
/ Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
/ Blood Pressure - drug effects
/ Blood Pressure - physiology
/ Child
/ Children & youth
/ Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects
/ Dextroamphetamine - therapeutic use
/ Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
/ Double-Blind Method
/ Drug dosages
/ Drug therapy
/ Education
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
/ Liver diseases
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Neurology
/ Neurosciences
/ Original
/ Original Research Article
/ Patients
/ Pharmacotherapy
/ Propylamines - adverse effects
/ Propylamines - therapeutic use
/ Psychiatry
/ Psychopharmacology
/ Studies
/ Suicides & suicide attempts
/ Teenagers
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Urine
2013
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a Head-to-Head, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase IIIb Study
by
Cardo, Esther
, Coghill, David
, Hodgkins, Paul
, Anderson, Colleen S.
, Higgins, Nicholas
, Lyne, Andrew
, Bloomfield, Ralph
, Dittmann, Ralf W.
, Caballero, Beatriz
, Civil, Richard
, Nagy, Peter
in
Adolescent
/ Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects
/ Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - therapeutic use
/ Age
/ Atomoxetine Hydrochloride
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - epidemiology
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology
/ Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
/ Blood Pressure - drug effects
/ Blood Pressure - physiology
/ Child
/ Children & youth
/ Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects
/ Dextroamphetamine - therapeutic use
/ Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
/ Double-Blind Method
/ Drug dosages
/ Drug therapy
/ Education
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
/ Liver diseases
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Neurology
/ Neurosciences
/ Original
/ Original Research Article
/ Patients
/ Pharmacotherapy
/ Propylamines - adverse effects
/ Propylamines - therapeutic use
/ Psychiatry
/ Psychopharmacology
/ Studies
/ Suicides & suicide attempts
/ Teenagers
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Urine
2013
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a Head-to-Head, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase IIIb Study
by
Cardo, Esther
, Coghill, David
, Hodgkins, Paul
, Anderson, Colleen S.
, Higgins, Nicholas
, Lyne, Andrew
, Bloomfield, Ralph
, Dittmann, Ralf W.
, Caballero, Beatriz
, Civil, Richard
, Nagy, Peter
in
Adolescent
/ Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects
/ Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - therapeutic use
/ Age
/ Atomoxetine Hydrochloride
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - epidemiology
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology
/ Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
/ Blood Pressure - drug effects
/ Blood Pressure - physiology
/ Child
/ Children & youth
/ Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects
/ Dextroamphetamine - therapeutic use
/ Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
/ Double-Blind Method
/ Drug dosages
/ Drug therapy
/ Education
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
/ Liver diseases
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Neurology
/ Neurosciences
/ Original
/ Original Research Article
/ Patients
/ Pharmacotherapy
/ Propylamines - adverse effects
/ Propylamines - therapeutic use
/ Psychiatry
/ Psychopharmacology
/ Studies
/ Suicides & suicide attempts
/ Teenagers
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Urine
2013
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a Head-to-Head, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase IIIb Study
Journal Article
Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a Head-to-Head, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase IIIb Study
2013
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objectives
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the prodrug psychostimulant lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) and the non-stimulant noradrenergic compound atomoxetine (ATX) in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who had previously responded inadequately to methylphenidate (MPH).
Methods
This 9-week, head-to-head, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study (SPD489-317; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01106430) enrolled patients (aged 6–17 years) with at least moderately symptomatic ADHD and an inadequate response to previous MPH therapy. Patients were randomized (1:1) to an optimized daily dose of LDX (30, 50 or 70 mg) or ATX (patients <70 kg, 0.5–1.2 mg/kg with total daily dose not to exceed 1.4 mg/kg; patients ≥70 kg, 40, 80 or 100 mg). The primary efficacy outcome was time (days) to first clinical response. Clinical response was defined as a Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved). Secondary efficacy outcomes included the proportion of responders at each study visit and the change from baseline in ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV) and CGI-Severity scores. Tolerability and safety were assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), height and weight, vital signs and electrocardiogram parameters. Endpoint was defined as the last post-baseline, on-treatment visit with a valid assessment.
Results
Of 267 patients randomized (LDX,
n
= 133; ATX,
n
= 134), 200 (74.9 %) completed the study. The median time to first clinical response [95 % confidence interval (CI)] was significantly shorter for patients receiving LDX [12.0 days (8.0–16.0)] than for those receiving ATX [21.0 days (15.0–23.0)] (
p
= 0.001). By week 9, 81.7 % (95 % CI 75.0–88.5) of patients receiving LDX had responded to treatment compared with 63.6 % (95 % CI 55.4–71.8) of those receiving ATX (
p
= 0.001). Also by week 9, the difference between LDX and ATX in least-squares mean change from baseline (95 % CI) was significant in favour of LDX for the ADHD-RS-IV total score [−6.5 (−9.3 to −3.6);
p
< 0.001; effect size 0.56], inattentiveness subscale score [−3.4 (−4.9 to −1.8);
p
< 0.001; effect size 0.53] and the hyperactivity/impulsivity subscale score [−3.2 (−4.6 to −1.7);
p
< 0.001; effect size 0.53]. TEAEs were reported by 71.9 and 70.9 % of patients receiving LDX and ATX, respectively. At endpoint, both treatments were associated with mean (standard deviation) increases in systolic blood pressure [LDX, +0.7 mmHg (9.08); ATX, +0.6 mmHg (7.96)], diastolic blood pressure [LDX, +0.1 mmHg (8.33); ATX, +1.3 mmHg (8.24)] and pulse rate [LDX, +3.6 bpm (10.49); ATX, +3.7 bpm (10.75)], and decreases in weight [LDX, −1.30 kg (1.806); ATX, −0.15 kg (1.434)].
Conclusions
LDX was associated with a faster and more robust treatment response than ATX in children and adolescents with at least moderately symptomatic ADHD who had previously responded inadequately to MPH. Both treatments displayed safety profiles consistent with findings from previous clinical trials.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
/ Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects
/ Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - therapeutic use
/ Age
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - drug therapy
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - epidemiology
/ Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - psychology
/ Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
/ Blood Pressure - drug effects
/ Child
/ Dextroamphetamine - adverse effects
/ Dextroamphetamine - therapeutic use
/ Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Original
/ Patients
/ Propylamines - adverse effects
/ Propylamines - therapeutic use
/ Studies
/ Urine
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.