Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality
Do you wish to request the book?
Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Machine-Learning Classification of Pulse Waveform Quality
2022
Overview
Pulse measurements made using wearable devices can aid the monitoring of human physiological condition. Accurate estimation of waveforms is often difficult for nonexperts; motion artifacts may occur during tonometry measurements when the skin–sensor contact pressure is insufficient. An alternative approach is to extract only high-quality pulses for use in index calculations. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of using machine-learning analysis in discriminating between high-quality and low-quality pulse waveforms induced by applying different contact pressures. Radial blood pressure waveform (BPW) signals were measured noninvasively in healthy young subjects using a strain-gauge transducer. One-minute-long trains of pulse data were measured when applying the appropriate contact pressure (67.80 ± 1.55 mmHg) and a higher contact pressure (151.80 ± 3.19 mmHg). Eight machine-learning algorithms were employed to evaluate the following 40 harmonic pulse indices: amplitude proportions and their coefficients of variation and phase angles and their standard deviations. Significant differences were noted in BPW indices between applying appropriate and higher skin–surface contact pressures. The present appropriate contact pressure could not only provide a suitable holding force for the wearable device but also helped to maintain the physiological stability of the underlying tissues. Machine-learning analysis provides an effective method for distinguishing between the high-quality and low-quality pulses with excellent discrimination performance (leave-one-subject-out test: random-forest AUC = 0.96). This approach will aid the development of an automatic screening method for waveform quality and thereby improve the noninvasive acquisition reliability. Other possible interfering factors in practical applications can also be systematically studied using a similar procedure.
