MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Machine learning in the prediction of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review
Machine learning in the prediction of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Machine learning in the prediction of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Machine learning in the prediction of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review
Machine learning in the prediction of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Machine learning in the prediction of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review
Machine learning in the prediction of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review
Journal Article

Machine learning in the prediction of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objective This systematic review provides an overview of machine learning (ML) methods for predicting diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Method We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases with the search period limited from their inception to December 3, 2024 (the last search date). The search terms were restricted to “diabetes,” “neuropathy,” and “machine learning.” All studies that developed or validated prognostic models for DPN using ML were considered. Prediction model Risk of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability of included studies. Results A total of 888 studies were retrieved and 15 articles were included. Most were retrospective studies, with sample sizes ranging from 90 to 102,876 patients. All 15 studies utilised internal validation methods, three studies employed both internal and external validation methods. Internal validation methods like cross-validation were widely used, with area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.640 to 0.900. A total of six studies reported complete AUC values yielding a pooled AUC of 0.773 (CI: 0.707–0.839, I²= 99.14). A total of 34 different ML algorithms were utilised across the studies, with the top five being logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, decision tree, and XGBoost. Calibration was reported in 6 studies, showing satisfactory performance. All studies had a high risk of bias, but most models demonstrated good applicability. Conclusion Existing DPN prediction models demonstrate good performance in discrimination. However, the evaluation indicates that the overall risk of bias in the included studies is high, and their applicability is limited. Future efforts should prioritize prospective, large, multicentre datasets, external validation, and adherence to PROBAST guidelines to reduce bias and enhance applicability for clinical application.