Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care
by
Lanham, Paul
, Kessler, David
, Gilbody, Simon
, Araya, Ricardo
, Duffy, Larisa
, Lewis, Glyn
, Button, Katherine S.
, Wiles, Nicola
, Lewis, Gemma
, Kounali, Daphne
, Peters, Tim J.
in
Antidepressants
/ Anxiety
/ Anxiety disorders
/ Changes
/ Clinical interviews
/ Clinical significance
/ Depression - diagnosis
/ Depression - epidemiology
/ Depression - therapy
/ Funding
/ Generalized anxiety disorder
/ Health care
/ Health research
/ Health services
/ Humans
/ Longitudinal Studies
/ Measures
/ Medical research
/ Medical treatment
/ Mental depression
/ Original
/ Original Article
/ Patients
/ Primary care
/ Primary Health Care
/ Prospective Studies
/ Public health
/ Questionnaires
/ Severity
/ Symptoms
/ United Kingdom
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care
by
Lanham, Paul
, Kessler, David
, Gilbody, Simon
, Araya, Ricardo
, Duffy, Larisa
, Lewis, Glyn
, Button, Katherine S.
, Wiles, Nicola
, Lewis, Gemma
, Kounali, Daphne
, Peters, Tim J.
in
Antidepressants
/ Anxiety
/ Anxiety disorders
/ Changes
/ Clinical interviews
/ Clinical significance
/ Depression - diagnosis
/ Depression - epidemiology
/ Depression - therapy
/ Funding
/ Generalized anxiety disorder
/ Health care
/ Health research
/ Health services
/ Humans
/ Longitudinal Studies
/ Measures
/ Medical research
/ Medical treatment
/ Mental depression
/ Original
/ Original Article
/ Patients
/ Primary care
/ Primary Health Care
/ Prospective Studies
/ Public health
/ Questionnaires
/ Severity
/ Symptoms
/ United Kingdom
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care
by
Lanham, Paul
, Kessler, David
, Gilbody, Simon
, Araya, Ricardo
, Duffy, Larisa
, Lewis, Glyn
, Button, Katherine S.
, Wiles, Nicola
, Lewis, Gemma
, Kounali, Daphne
, Peters, Tim J.
in
Antidepressants
/ Anxiety
/ Anxiety disorders
/ Changes
/ Clinical interviews
/ Clinical significance
/ Depression - diagnosis
/ Depression - epidemiology
/ Depression - therapy
/ Funding
/ Generalized anxiety disorder
/ Health care
/ Health research
/ Health services
/ Humans
/ Longitudinal Studies
/ Measures
/ Medical research
/ Medical treatment
/ Mental depression
/ Original
/ Original Article
/ Patients
/ Primary care
/ Primary Health Care
/ Prospective Studies
/ Public health
/ Questionnaires
/ Severity
/ Symptoms
/ United Kingdom
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care
Journal Article
How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) are widely used in the evaluation of interventions for depression and anxiety. The smallest reduction in depressive symptoms that matter to patients is known as the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID). Little empirical study of the MCID for these scales exists.
A prospective cohort of 400 patients in UK primary care were interviewed on four occasions, 2 weeks apart. At each time point, participants completed all three questionnaires and a 'global rating of change' scale (GRS). MCID estimation relied on estimated changes in symptoms according to reported improvement on the GRS scale, stratified by baseline severity on the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R).
For moderate baseline severity, those who reported improvement on the GRS had a reduction of 21% (95% confidence interval (CI) -26.7 to -14.9) on the PHQ-9; 23% (95% CI -27.8 to -18.0) on the BDI-II and 26.8% (95% CI -33.5 to -20.1) on the GAD-7. The corresponding threshold scores below which participants were more likely to report improvement were -1.7, -3.5 and -1.5 points on the PHQ-9, BDI-II and GAD-7, respectively. Patients with milder symptoms require much larger reductions as percentage of their baseline to endorse improvement.
An MCID representing 20% reduction of scores in these scales, is a useful guide for patients with moderately severe symptoms. If treatment had the same effect on patients irrespective of baseline severity, those with low symptoms are unlikely to notice a benefit.
Funding. National Institute for Health Research.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.