Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Monitored Anesthesia Care Without Endotracheal Intubation Is Safe and Efficacious for Single-Balloon Enteroscopy
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Monitored Anesthesia Care Without Endotracheal Intubation Is Safe and Efficacious for Single-Balloon Enteroscopy
Do you wish to request the book?
Monitored Anesthesia Care Without Endotracheal Intubation Is Safe and Efficacious for Single-Balloon Enteroscopy
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Monitored Anesthesia Care Without Endotracheal Intubation Is Safe and Efficacious for Single-Balloon Enteroscopy
2014
Overview
Background
General endotracheal (GET) anesthesia is often used during single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). However, there is currently limited data regarding monitored anesthesia care (MAC) without endotracheal intubation for this procedure.
Aims
The aim of the study was to determine the safety and efficacy of MAC sedation during SBE and to identify risk factors for adverse events.
Methods
All patients who underwent SBE and SBE-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between June 2011 and July 2013 at a tertiary-care referral center were studied in a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. Patients received MAC anesthesia or GET. The main outcome measurements were sedation-related adverse events, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic yield.
Results
Of the 178 cases in the study, 166 cases (93 %) were performed with MAC and 12 (7 %) with GET. Intra-procedure sedation-related adverse events occurred in 17 % of cases. The most frequent event was transient hypotension requiring pharmacologic intervention in 11.8 % of procedures. In MAC cases, the diagnostic yield was 58.4 % and the therapeutic yield was 30.1 %. Anesthesia duration was strongly associated with the occurrence of a sedation-related adverse event (
P
= 0.005).
Conclusions
MAC is a safe and efficacious sedation approach for most patients undergoing SBE. Sedation-related complications in SBE are uncommon, but are more frequent in longer procedures.
Publisher
Springer US,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
/ Aged
/ Analysis
/ Anesthesia, General - adverse effects
/ Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage
/ Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology
/ Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects
/ Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - methods
/ Digestive System Diseases - diagnosis
/ Digestive System Diseases - therapy
/ Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects
/ Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods
/ Oncology
