Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Underlying features of epigenetic aging clocks in vivo and in vitro
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Underlying features of epigenetic aging clocks in vivo and in vitro
Do you wish to request the book?
Underlying features of epigenetic aging clocks in vivo and in vitro
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Underlying features of epigenetic aging clocks in vivo and in vitro
2020
Overview
Epigenetic clocks, developed using DNA methylation data, have been widely used to quantify biological aging in multiple tissues/cells. However, many existing epigenetic clocks are weakly correlated with each other, suggesting they may capture different biological processes. We utilize multi‐omics data from diverse human tissue/cells to identify shared features across eleven existing epigenetic clocks. Despite the striking lack of overlap in CpGs, multi‐omics analysis suggested five clocks (Horvath1, Horvath2, Levine, Hannum, and Lin) share transcriptional associations conserved across purified CD14+ monocytes and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The pathways enriched in the shared transcriptional association suggested links between epigenetic aging and metabolism, immunity, and autophagy. Results from in vitro experiments showed that two clocks (Levine and Lin) were accelerated in accordance with two hallmarks of aging—cellular senescence and mitochondrial dysfunction. Finally, using multi‐tissue data to deconstruct the epigenetic clock signals, we developed a meta‐clock that demonstrated improved prediction for mortality and robustly related to hallmarks of aging in vitro than single clocks. We compared 11 existing epigenetic clocks on the basis of their functional characteristics, transcriptional associations, and ability to capture hallmarks of aging. We then decomposed their signals and recombined them into a “meta‐clock.” This meta‐clock showed stronger prediction of all‐cause mortality than any one epigenetic clock and was able to distinguish tumor from normal tissue and capture epigenetic changes in two types of senescence (replicative and oncogene induced).
