Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Outcomes of Window Therapy with Carboplatin and Ifosfamide for Pediatric Osteosarcoma: A Case Series
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Outcomes of Window Therapy with Carboplatin and Ifosfamide for Pediatric Osteosarcoma: A Case Series
Do you wish to request the book?
Outcomes of Window Therapy with Carboplatin and Ifosfamide for Pediatric Osteosarcoma: A Case Series
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Outcomes of Window Therapy with Carboplatin and Ifosfamide for Pediatric Osteosarcoma: A Case Series
2023
Overview
For the treatment of osteosarcoma, cisplatin (CDDP) can be substituted by carboplatin (CBDCA) to reduce toxicity. We report a single institution experience of CBDCA-based regimen. Two to three cycles of CBDCA + ifosfamide (IFO) therapy (window therapy) were administered as neoadjuvant therapy for osteosarcoma. Depending on the response of window therapy, the subsequent protocols were determined; for good responders, surgery is performed, and postoperative therapies with CBDCA + IFO, adriamycin (ADM) and high-dose methotrexate (MTX) were administered; for stable disease, the postoperative regimens were advanced before surgery, and the remaining amount of postoperative chemotherapy is deduced; for progressive disease, CBDCA-based regimen is changed to CDDP-based regimen. From 2009 to 2019, seven patients were treated with this protocol. During the window therapy, two patients (28.6%) were assessed as good responders and completed the regimen as planned. Four patients (57.1%) had stable disease, and the chemotherapy schedules were modified. One patient (14.2%) with progressive disease was shifted to the CDDP-based regimen. At final follow-up, four patients showed no evidence of disease and three patients died of the disease. Since the efficacy during window therapy was limited, a CBDCA-based regimen in the neoadjuvant setting was considered insufficient for performing adequate surgery.
