Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Effects of Different Occlusal Splints on Joint Vibrations in Bruxers
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Effects of Different Occlusal Splints on Joint Vibrations in Bruxers
Do you wish to request the book?
Effects of Different Occlusal Splints on Joint Vibrations in Bruxers
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Effects of Different Occlusal Splints on Joint Vibrations in Bruxers
2025
Overview
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hard, soft, and semi-soft splints on TMJ vibrations in bruxers with JVA and to compare them with data obtained from asymptomatic individuals. Materials and Methods: A total of 64 individuals were divided into four subgroups: control (n = 15); and hard (n = 17), soft (n = 16), and semi-soft (n = 16) splints. Electrovibratography records from all individuals included in the study before and after the 3-month splint treatment were obtained with the Biopak® System. Joint vibration analysis was used to evaluate TMJ sounds. Data normality was examined with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Levene tests. The significance of the differences was investigated by One-Way ANOVA and by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Conover’s multiple comparison test was used in post hoc tests. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06893744, on 24 March 2025, titled; Effects of Different Occlusal Splints). Results: After 3 months of treatment, for I < 300 Hz right opening, the control group was statistically lower than both semi-soft (p < 0.001) and hard (p < 0.001) splint groups. The difference between semi-soft and hard splints in post-treatment I < 300 Hz right opening is not statistically significant. After 3 months of treatment compared with the beginning, the increases in left-opening Ti (p = 0.004), I < 300 Hz (p = 0.004), and PA (p = 0.007) values in the soft splint group were statistically significant. Conclusions: All three kinds of splints improved clinical symptoms and complaints of bruxers. For joint vibrations in bruxers, hard and semi-soft splints are more beneficial than soft splints.
Publisher
MDPI AG,MDPI
Subject
