Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Fear learning circuitry is biased toward generalization of fear associations in posttraumatic stress disorder
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Fear learning circuitry is biased toward generalization of fear associations in posttraumatic stress disorder
Do you wish to request the book?
Fear learning circuitry is biased toward generalization of fear associations in posttraumatic stress disorder
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Fear learning circuitry is biased toward generalization of fear associations in posttraumatic stress disorder
2015
Overview
Fear conditioning is an established model for investigating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, symptom triggers may vaguely resemble the initial traumatic event, differing on a variety of sensory and affective dimensions. We extended the fear-conditioning model to assess generalization of conditioned fear on fear processing neurocircuitry in PTSD. Military veterans (
n
=67) consisting of PTSD (
n
=32) and trauma-exposed comparison (
n
=35) groups underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during fear conditioning to a low fear-expressing face while a neutral face was explicitly unreinforced. Stimuli that varied along a neutral-to-fearful continuum were presented before conditioning to assess baseline responses, and after conditioning to assess experience-dependent changes in neural activity. Compared with trauma-exposed controls, PTSD patients exhibited greater post-study memory distortion of the fear-conditioned stimulus toward the stimulus expressing the highest fear intensity. PTSD patients exhibited biased neural activation toward high-intensity stimuli in fusiform gyrus (
P
<0.02), insula (
P
<0.001), primary visual cortex (
P
<0.05), locus coeruleus (
P
<0.04), thalamus (
P
<0.01), and at the trend level in inferior frontal gyrus (
P
=0.07). All regions except fusiform were moderated by childhood trauma. Amygdala–calcarine (
P
=0.01) and amygdala–thalamus (
P
=0.06) functional connectivity selectively increased in PTSD patients for high-intensity stimuli after conditioning. In contrast, amygdala–ventromedial prefrontal cortex (
P
=0.04) connectivity selectively increased in trauma-exposed controls compared with PTSD patients for low-intensity stimuli after conditioning, representing safety learning. In summary, fear generalization in PTSD is biased toward stimuli with higher emotional intensity than the original conditioned-fear stimulus. Functional brain differences provide a putative neurobiological model for fear generalization whereby PTSD symptoms are triggered by threat cues that merely resemble the index trauma.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group
