Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clinical physicists’ perceptions of weekly chart checks and the potential role for automated image review assessed by structured interviews
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Clinical physicists’ perceptions of weekly chart checks and the potential role for automated image review assessed by structured interviews
Do you wish to request the book?
Clinical physicists’ perceptions of weekly chart checks and the potential role for automated image review assessed by structured interviews
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Clinical physicists’ perceptions of weekly chart checks and the potential role for automated image review assessed by structured interviews
2024
Overview
Background This study utilizes interviews of clinical medical physicists to investigate self‐reported shortcomings of the current weekly chart check workflow and opportunities for improvement. Methods Nineteen medical physicists were recruited for a 30‐minute semi‐structured interview, with a particular focus placed on image review and the use of automated tools for image review in weekly checks. Survey‐type questions were used to gather quantitative information about chart check practices and importance placed on reducing chart check workloads versus increasing chart check effectiveness. Open‐ended questions were used to probe respondents about their current weekly chart check workflow, opinions of the value of weekly chart checks and perceived shortcomings, and barriers and facilitators to the implementation of automated chart check tools. Thematic analysis was used to develop common themes across the interviews. Results Physicists ranked highly the value of reducing the time spent on weekly chart checks (average 6.3 on a scale from 1 to 10), but placed more value on increasing the effectiveness of checks with an average of 9.2 on a 1–10 scale. Four major themes were identified: (1) weekly chart checks need to adapt to an electronic record‐and‐verify chart environment, (2) physicists could add value to patient care by analyzing images without duplicating the work done by physicians, (3) greater support for trending analysis is needed in weekly checks, and (4) automation has the potential to increase the value of physics checks. Conclusion This study identified several key shortcomings of the current weekly chart check process from the perspective of the clinical medical physicist. Our results show strong support for automating components of the weekly check workflow in order to allow for more effective checks that emphasize follow‐up, trending, failure modes and effects analysis, and allow time to be spent on other higher value tasks that improve patient safety.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc
