Journal Article

Values and preferences towards the use of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy: a convergent mixed-methods secondary analysis of data from the decision analysis in shared decision making for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy (DASH-TOP) study

Guyatt, Gordon, López, Sandra Redondo, Caño, Juan Antonio Millón, Perestelo‑Perez, Lilisbeth, Alonso‑Coello, Pablo, Pelayo, Irene, Shehata, Nadine, Golembiewski, Elizabeth, Jack, Susan M., León‑García, Montserrat, Xie, Feng, D’Souza, Rohan, Gravholt, Derek L., Eckman, Mark H., Bates, Shannon M., Hargraves, Ian, Alcántara, Milagros A. Suito, Humphries, Brittany

2024

Overview

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, and the use of preventive low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) can be challenging. Clinical guidelines recommend eliciting pregnant individuals’ preferences towards the use of daily injections of LMWH and discussing the best option through a shared decision-making (SDM) approach. Our aim was to identify individuals’ preferences concerning each of the main clinical outcomes, and categorize attributes influencing the use of LMWH during pregnancy. Methods Design: Convergent mixed-methods. Participants: Pregnant women or those planning a pregnancy with VTE recurrence risk. Intervention: A SDM intervention about thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in pregnancy. Analysis: Quantitatively, we report preference scores assigned to each of the health states. Qualitatively, we categorized preference attributes using Burke’s pentad of motives framework: act (what needs to be done), scene (patient’s context), agent (perspectives and influence of people involved in the decision), agency (aspects of the medication), and purpose (patient’s goals). We use mixed-method convergent analysis to report findings using side-by-side comparison of concordance/discordance. Results We comprehensively determined preferences for using LMWH by pregnant individuals at risk of VTE: through value elicitation exercises we found that the least valued health state was to experience a pulmonary embolism (PE), followed by major obstetrical bleeding (MOB), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and using daily injections of LMWH (valued as closest to a ‘healthy pregnancy’); through interviews we found that: previous experiences, access to care (scene) and shared decision-making (agent) affected preferences. LMWH's benefits were noted, but substantial drawbacks were described (agency). For participants, the main goal of using LMWH was avoiding any risks in pregnancy (purpose). Side-by-side comparisons revealed concordance and discordance between health states and motives. Conclusions Mixed-methods provide a nuanced understanding of LMWH preferences, by quantifying health states preferences and exploring attributes qualitatively. Incorporating both methods may improve patient-centered care around preference-sensitive decisions in thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
• Subject: Analysis / Angiology / Cardiology / Care and treatment / Decision-making / Health aspects / Hematology / Low-molecular-weight heparin / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Methods / Practice guidelines (Medicine) / Preferences / Pregnancy / Pregnant women / Pulmonary embolism / Shared decision-making / Thromboembolism / Values / Venous thromboembolism