Journal Article

Prospectively Randomized Controlled Trial on Damage Control Surgery for Perforated Diverticulitis with Generalized Peritonitis

Gasser, Elisabeth, Kaufman, Claudia, Czipin, Sasha, Kafka-Ritsch, Reinhold, Öfner, Dietmar, Zitt, Matthias, Perathoner, Alexander, Aigner, Felix

2020

Overview

Introduction Damage control surgery (DCS) with abdominal negative pressure therapy and delayed anastomosis creation in patients with perforated diverticulitis and generalized peritonitis was established at our Institution in 2006 and has been published. The concept was adopted in other hospitals and published as a case series. This is the first prospectively controlled randomized study comparing DCS and conventional treatment (Group C) in this setting. Methods All consecutive patients from 2013 to 2018 with indication for surgery were screened and randomized to Group DCS or Group C. The primary outcome was the rate of reconstructed bowel at discharge and at 6 month. Informed consent was obtained. The trial was approved by the local ethics committee and registered at CinicalTrials.gov: NCT04034407. Results A total of 56 patients were screened; 41 patients gave informed consent to participate and ultimately 21 patients (9 female) with intraoperatively confirmed Hinchey III ( n  = 14, 67%) or IV ( n  = 7, 33%), and a median (range) age of 66 (42–92), Mannheim Peritonitis Index of 25 (12–37) and Charlson Comorbidity Index of 3 (0–10) were intraoperatively randomized and treated as Group DCS ( n  = 13) or Group C ( n  = 8). Per protocol analysis: A primary anastomosis without ileostomy (PA) was performed in 92% (11/12) patients in Group DCS at the second-look operation, one patient died before second look, and one underwent a Hartmann procedure (HP). In Group C 63% (5/8) patients received a PA and 38% (3/8) patients a HP. Two patients in Group C, but none in Group DCS experienced anastomotic leakage (AI). ICU and hospital stay was median (range) 2 (1–10) and 17.5 (12–43) in DCS and 2 (1–62) and 22 (13–65) days in group C. In Group DCS 8% (1/12) patients was discharged with a stoma versus 57% (4/7) in Group C ( p  = 0.038, n.s., α  = 0.025); one patient died before discharge. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for discharge with a stoma is 0.068 (0.005–0.861). Intent to treat analysis: A PA was performed in 90% (9/10) of patients randomized to DCS, one patient died before the second look, and one patient received a HP. In group C, 70% (7/10) were treated with PA and 30% (3/10) with HP. 29% (2/7) experienced AI treated with protective ileostomy. In group DCS, 9% (1/11) were discharged with a stoma versus 40% (4/10) in group C ( p  = 0.14, n.s.). The odds ratio for discharge with a stoma is 0.139 (0.012–1.608). Conclusion This is the first prospectively randomized controlled study showing that damage control surgery in perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III and IV enhances reconstruction of bowel continuity and can reduce the stoma rate at discharge.

• Publisher: Springer International Publishing,John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Subject: Abdominal Surgery / Adult / Aged / Aged, 80 and over / Anastomosis / Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects / Anastomotic leak / Cardiac Surgery / Confidence intervals / Damage / Diverticulitis / Diverticulitis - complications / Diverticulitis - surgery / Female / General Surgery / Humans / Ileostomy / Informed consent / Intestinal Perforation - etiology / Intestinal Perforation - surgery / Intestine / Male / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Middle Aged / Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy / Original Scientific Report / Ostomy / Patients / Peritonitis / Peritonitis - etiology / Peritonitis - surgery / Prospective Studies / Surgery / Thoracic Surgery / Treatment Outcome / Vascular Surgery