Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
ZHU XI, THE FOUR-SEVEN DEBATE, AND WITTGENSTEIN'S DILEMMA
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
ZHU XI, THE FOUR-SEVEN DEBATE, AND WITTGENSTEIN'S DILEMMA
Do you wish to request the book?
ZHU XI, THE FOUR-SEVEN DEBATE, AND WITTGENSTEIN'S DILEMMA
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
ZHU XI, THE FOUR-SEVEN DEBATE, AND WITTGENSTEIN'S DILEMMA
2015
Overview
The scholarly consensus on Zhu Xi is that he is brilliant but often unclear, and perhaps even inconsistent, especially with regard to the central concept of li (principle). Any interpretation of his system requires a certain amount of creative reconstruction. The purpose of this essay is to examine the attempts elucidate Zhu Xi's doctrine of li over the course of the Four-Seven Debate. It be seen that the Korean philosophers T'oegye and Yulgok provide competing but complementary explanations of a pivotal issue in Zhu's moral metaphysics, namely how the li can serve as a standard for moral goodness. However, they both stand in a certain amount of tension, not only with each other but with Zhu himself. It is hoped to show that by juxtaposing the two reconstructions the philosophical problem that arises for Zhu, and for anyone attempting a similar project, can be clarified.
