Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Influence of cockle bioturbation on microphytobenthic primary producers: habitat and density-dependent effects
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Influence of cockle bioturbation on microphytobenthic primary producers: habitat and density-dependent effects
Do you wish to request the book?
Influence of cockle bioturbation on microphytobenthic primary producers: habitat and density-dependent effects
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Influence of cockle bioturbation on microphytobenthic primary producers: habitat and density-dependent effects
2025
Overview
While the global impact of the edible cockle
Cerastoderma edule
on microphytobenthos (MPB) dynamics has been extensively studied, some underlying processes remain unknown, such as their non-trophic interactions. For this purpose, a laboratory mesocosm experimental approach was used to quantify the bioturbation generated by
C. edule
adults and their influence on oxygen and nutrient fluxes, MPB biomass and photosynthetic performance at the sediment-water interface. The effects of sediment properties and cockle densities (0, 288, 720 and 1,297 ind. m
−2
) were also investigated. Our results showed that cockles exert a net negative density-dependent effect on MPB biomass, with intensity varying according to sediment type. This is mainly due to sediment reworking by cockles and their emergence at the sediment surface, mechanically disrupting MPB biofilms. Nonetheless, the physiological status and photosynthetic performances of the remaining MPB cells were not impacted. This could be explained by cockle bioirrigation which stimulates nutrient fluxes at the sediment surface and cell turnover. In the finest sediment, the stimulation of MPB growth by nutrient fluxes did not compensate algal biomass loss due to burial, leading to a net decrease in MPB biomass. In coarser sediment, no significant impact of cockles on the net total MPB biomass was observed. This indicates a balance between suboptimal sediment condition for MPB, biofilm destruction by cockles, and enhanced bioirrigation rates that increase nutrient availability for MPB biofilms at the sediment-water interface.
