MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of the Frequencies of Myocardial Edema Determined by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Patients Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Comparison of the Frequencies of Myocardial Edema Determined by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Patients Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of the Frequencies of Myocardial Edema Determined by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Patients Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of the Frequencies of Myocardial Edema Determined by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Patients Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Comparison of the Frequencies of Myocardial Edema Determined by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Patients Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of the Frequencies of Myocardial Edema Determined by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Patients Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Comparison of the Frequencies of Myocardial Edema Determined by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Patients Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Journal Article

Comparison of the Frequencies of Myocardial Edema Determined by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Patients Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

2014
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The specific mechanisms by which diabetes may affect the myocardial tissue response to ischemia are unclear. Our objective was to prospectively quantify the degree of myocardial edema in diabetics versus nondiabetics with ST elevation myocardial infarction using cardiac magnetic resonance. Fifty-two patients (16 diabetics and 36 nondiabetics) were enrolled after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and underwent cardiac magnetic resonance on a 1.5-T scanner at 48 hours and 6 months. Myocardial edema was quantified using a T2 mapping technique, and infarct size and microvascular obstruction size were assessed by way of a contrast-enhanced T1-weighted inversion recovery gradient-echo sequence. The infarct segment T2 was elevated in diabetics compared with nondiabetics (59.0 ± 8.0 vs 50.8 ± 3.1 ms, p <0.001) at 48 hours. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diabetes (p <0.001) and symptom-to-balloon time (p = 0.04) were independent predictors of the degree of acute myocardial edema. Infarct size was nonsignificantly higher in the diabetic group at 48 hours (26.9 ± 9.4% vs 20.1 ± 10.1% of myocardium, p = 0.07) and 6 months (17.1 ± 6.3% vs 13.4 ± 6.1% of myocardium, p = 0.09). Microvascular obstruction size was equivalent in both groups, and there was a trend toward lower myocardial salvage index in diabetics (34.2 ± 11.8 vs 49.6 ± 13.4, p = 0.08). In conclusion, diabetes is associated with increased myocardial edema in the acute phase after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Our results offer insight into the complex processes that characterize myocardial tissue response to injury in diabetic patients.