MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study
Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study
Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study
Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study
Journal Article

Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study

2017
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Morbid obesity is associated with a difficult management of the airway. There is no agreement on these patients being difficult to intubate, but if they are difficult to ventilate with facial mask, then the fast control of their airway becomes a priority. This study compares the quickness and success in tracheal intubation, glottic view, hemodynamic response, and complications from the use of the Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients for scheduled surgery. Prospective, observational, and randomized study. Operating room. Forty-six American Society of Anesthesiologists III patients. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo tracheal intubation using a Macintosh (n=23) or an Airtraq laryngoscope (n=23). The following were compared: intubation time, laryngeal vision, the necessity of additional maneuvers to carry out the tracheal intubation, the success of the maneuvers, complications, and hemodynamic response. The preoperative conditions of the studied patients were similar in both groups. The average time of the intubation was 17.27±16.1 seconds and 22.11±13.62 seconds in the Airtraq and Macintosh groups, respectively (P=.279). With the Airtraq device, 95.65% of patients presented a glottic view 1 and 2a (P=.006) and less optimizing maneuvers were needed to perform the tracheal intubation (P=.001). There were no cases of difficult intubation, failed intubation, or difficult ventilation. A statistically significant increase in the heart rate was detected with the use of the Macintosh laryngoscope. A patient with redundant epiglottis could not be intubated with the Airtraq laryngoscope. Both devices allow quick and safe management of the airway. The Airtraq laryngoscope improved the glottic view by the modified Cormack-Lehane classification, reduced the need for additional maneuvers for tracheal intubation, and also reduced the degree of sympathetic stimulus detected by a minor increase in heart rate after tracheal intubation. •Airway's management depends on 4 variables: patient, physician, time, and equipment.•In the design and development of the present study, all variables were controlled.•The “equipment” variable was assessed with none or minimum interference.•Both devices allow a quick and safe airway management in a morbidly obese patient.•The Airtraq laryngoscope improved the glottic view by the modified Cormack-Lehane.