Journal Article

Comparison of veterinary drug residue results in animal tissues by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole or quadrupole–time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry after different sample preparation methods, including use of a commercial lipid removal product

Zweigenbaum, Jerry, Stevens, Joan, Anumol, Tarun, Lehotay, Steven J.

2017

Overview

Veterinary drug residues in animal-derived foods must be monitored to ensure food safety, verify proper veterinary practices, enforce legal limits in domestic and imported foods, and for other purposes. A common goal in drug residue analysis in foods is to achieve acceptable monitoring results for as many analytes as possible, with higher priority given to the drugs of most concern, in an efficient and robust manner. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has implemented a multiclass, multi-residue method based on sample preparation using dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE) for cleanup and ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QQQ) for analysis of >120 drugs at regulatory levels of concern in animal tissues. Recently, a new cleanup product called “enhanced matrix removal for lipids” (EMR-L) was commercially introduced that used a unique chemical mechanism to remove lipids from extracts. Furthermore, high-resolution quadrupole–time-of-flight (Q/TOF) for (U)HPLC detection often yields higher selectivity than targeted QQQ analyzers while allowing retroactive processing of samples for other contaminants. In this study, the use of both d-SPE and EMR-L sample preparation and UHPLC-QQQ and UHPLC-Q/TOF analysis methods for shared spiked samples of bovine muscle, kidney, and liver was compared. The results showed that the EMR-L method provided cleaner extracts overall and improved results for several anthelmintics and tranquilizers compared to the d-SPE method, but the EMR-L method gave lower recoveries for certain β-lactam antibiotics. QQQ vs. Q/TOF detection showed similar mixed performance advantages depending on analytes and matrix interferences, with an advantage to Q/TOF for greater possible analytical scope and non-targeted data collection. Either combination of approaches may be used to meet monitoring purposes, with an edge in efficiency to d-SPE, but greater instrument robustness and less matrix effects when analyzing EMR-L extracts. Graphical abstract Comparison of cleanup methods in the analysis of veterinary drug residues in bovine tissues

• Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Agriculture / Analytical Chemistry / Animal food / Animal tissues / Animal-based foods / Animals / Antibiotics / Antiparasitic agents / Biochemistry / Cattle / Characterization and Evaluation of Materials / Chemistry / Chemistry and Materials Science / Chromatography / Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods / Comparative analysis / Contaminants / Data collection / Drug Residues - analysis / Drug Residues - chemistry / Drug Residues - isolation & purification / Drugs / Food safety / Food Science / Foods / Hydrocarbons / Kidney - metabolism / Laboratory Medicine / Lipids / Lipids - analysis / Lipids - chemistry / Lipids - isolation & purification / Liquid chromatography / Liver - metabolism / Mass spectrometry / Methods / Monitoring / Monitoring/Environmental Analysis / Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism / Nutritional aspects / Research Paper / Residues / Safety and security measures / Sample preparation / Sampling methods / Scientific imaging / Solid Phase Extraction / Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods / Time-of-flight mass spectrometry / Tissue Distribution / Veterinary / Veterinary drug residues / Veterinary Drugs - analysis / Veterinary Drugs - chemistry / Veterinary Drugs - isolation & purification