Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
by
Kuma, Hidekazu
, Yamaguchi, Shigeki
, Terahara, Takaaki
, Shirakawa, Kenshu
, Takeno, Masafumi
in
Cyclooxygenase (COX)
/ Diclofenac sodium
/ Gastrointestinal disorders
/ Internal Medicine
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ NSAID
/ Original Research
/ Pain Medicine
/ Whole blood assay (WBA)
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
by
Kuma, Hidekazu
, Yamaguchi, Shigeki
, Terahara, Takaaki
, Shirakawa, Kenshu
, Takeno, Masafumi
in
Cyclooxygenase (COX)
/ Diclofenac sodium
/ Gastrointestinal disorders
/ Internal Medicine
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ NSAID
/ Original Research
/ Pain Medicine
/ Whole blood assay (WBA)
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
by
Kuma, Hidekazu
, Yamaguchi, Shigeki
, Terahara, Takaaki
, Shirakawa, Kenshu
, Takeno, Masafumi
in
Cyclooxygenase (COX)
/ Diclofenac sodium
/ Gastrointestinal disorders
/ Internal Medicine
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ NSAID
/ Original Research
/ Pain Medicine
/ Whole blood assay (WBA)
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
Journal Article
Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Introduction
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders and exert pharmacological effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX). Although previous studies have evaluated the COX inhibitory activity and selectivity of NSAIDs, none has compared COX inhibitory concentrations with the plasma concentrations of clinical doses or investigated the efficacy and adverse effects of different dosage forms. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the COX inhibitory activities and inhibition rates of clinical doses of the various NSAID formulations, especially diclofenac sodium.
Methods
Human blood and the drug (diclofenac sodium, celecoxib, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, or etodolac) were mixed and incubated, and the supernatant was collected and quantified the COX inhibitory activity of each drug by ELISA. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the inhibition rates at maximum plasma drug concentration (
C
max
) of clinical doses of marketed formulations. For diclofenac sodium, we also calculated the concentrations at which COX inhibition rates were 50% and 80% (IC
50
and IC
80
).
Results
COX-2 inhibition rate at
C
max
of clinical doses exceeded 50% except celecoxib 100 mg. For diclofenac sodium, the
C
max
at the clinical doses of the oral and suppository formulations showed almost complete inhibition of COX-2 and an inhibition rate exceeding IC
80
for COX-1. The
C
max
at repeated doses of the transdermal formulation showed an inhibition rate above IC
80
for COX-2 but below IC
80
for COX-1.
Discussion
This result explains why gastrointestinal disorders frequently occur with oral and suppository formulations of diclofenac sodium despite its relatively high COX-2 selectivity. Although the plasma drug concentration of the transdermal formulation is lower than oral and suppository formulations, it has an inhibition rate above IC
50
for COX-2, which is required for analgesic efficacy, and has a lower COX-1 inhibition rate than these formulations.
Conclusion
The findings explain why the transdermal formulation exerts an analgesic effect despite having a lower
C
max
than other diclofenac sodium formulations.
Publisher
Springer Healthcare,Adis, Springer Healthcare
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.