Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted imaging for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted imaging for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
The diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted imaging for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted imaging for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2024
Overview
Objective
To clarify the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted imaging in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) through a meta-analysis.
Methods
Relevant literature on AI for early DDH diagnosis was searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases until April 4, 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. Revman5.4 and StataSE-64 software were used to calculate the combined sensitivity, specificity, AUC value, and DOC value of AI-assisted imaging for DDH diagnosis.
Results
The meta-analysis included 13 studies (6 prospective and 7 retrospective) with 28 AI models and a total of 10,673 samples. The summary sensitivity, specificity, AUC value, and DOC value were 99.0% (95% CI: 97.0-100.0%), 94.0% (95% CI: 89.0–96.0%), 99.0% (95% CI: 98.0-100.0%), and 1342 (95% CI: 469–3842), respectively.
Conclusion
AI-assisted imaging demonstrates high diagnostic efficacy for DDH detection, improving the accuracy of early DDH imaging examination. More prospective studies are needed to further confirm the value of AI-assisted imaging for early DDH diagnosis.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
