MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Incidence and Outcome of Vertebral Artery Dissection in Trauma Setting: Analysis of National Trauma Data Base
Incidence and Outcome of Vertebral Artery Dissection in Trauma Setting: Analysis of National Trauma Data Base
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Incidence and Outcome of Vertebral Artery Dissection in Trauma Setting: Analysis of National Trauma Data Base
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Incidence and Outcome of Vertebral Artery Dissection in Trauma Setting: Analysis of National Trauma Data Base
Incidence and Outcome of Vertebral Artery Dissection in Trauma Setting: Analysis of National Trauma Data Base

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Incidence and Outcome of Vertebral Artery Dissection in Trauma Setting: Analysis of National Trauma Data Base
Incidence and Outcome of Vertebral Artery Dissection in Trauma Setting: Analysis of National Trauma Data Base
Journal Article

Incidence and Outcome of Vertebral Artery Dissection in Trauma Setting: Analysis of National Trauma Data Base

2014
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background The natural history and epidemiological aspects of traumatic vertebral artery dissection (VAD) are not fully understood. We determined the prevalence of VAD and impact on outcome of patients with head and neck trauma. Methods All the patients who were admitted with traumatic brain injury or head and neck trauma were identified by ICD-9-CM codes from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), using data files from 2009 to 2010. NTDB represents one of the largest trauma databases and contains data from over 900 trauma centers across the United States. Presence of VAD was identified in these patients by using ICD-9-CM codes. Admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, injury severity score (ISS), in-hospital complications, and treatment outcome were compared between patients with and without VAD. Results A total of 84 VAD patients were identified which comprised 0.01 % of all patients admitted with head and neck trauma. The mean age (in years) for patients with VAD was significantly higher than patients without dissection [46 (95 % CI 41–50) vs. 41.3 (95 % CI 41.2–41.4); p  = 0.003]. The proportion of patients presenting with GCS score <9 was significantly higher in patients with VAD (31 vs. 12 %, p  < 0.0001). The rate of cervical vertebral fracture was significantly higher in patients with VAD (71 vs. 11 %, p  < 0.0001). Patients with VAD had higher rates of in-hospital stroke than patients without dissection (5 vs. 0.2 %, p  < 0.0001). Numbers of ICU days, ventilator days, and hospital length of stays were all significantly higher in patients with VAD. These differences remained significant after adjusting for the demographics, admission GCS score, and ISS ( p  < 0.0001). A total of 7 % ( N  = 6) of the patients with VAD received endovascular treatment and there was no in-hospital stroke in these patients. Patients with VAD had a higher chance of discharge to nursing facilities in comparison to head trauma patients without VAD (OR: 2.1; 95 % CI 1.4–3.5; p  < 0.0001). Conclusion Although infrequent, VAD in head and neck trauma is associated with higher rates of in-hospital stroke and longer length of ICU stay and total hospital stay. Early diagnosis and endovascular treatment may be an alternative option to reduce the rate of in-hospital stroke in these patients.