Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Curriculum design for social, cognitive and emotional engagement in Knowledge Building
by
Raman Preeti
, Slotta Jim
, Xing Wanli
, Zhu Gaoxia
in
Cognition
/ College students
/ Colleges & universities
/ Course Content
/ Curricula
/ Curriculum Design
/ Curriculum development
/ Emotions
/ Feedback
/ Graduate students
/ Higher education
/ Knowledge
/ Knowledge base
/ Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)
/ Learning
/ Negative emotions
/ Research design
/ Research methodology
/ Social & emotional learning
/ Soliciting
/ Student participation
/ Students
/ Teaching
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Curriculum design for social, cognitive and emotional engagement in Knowledge Building
by
Raman Preeti
, Slotta Jim
, Xing Wanli
, Zhu Gaoxia
in
Cognition
/ College students
/ Colleges & universities
/ Course Content
/ Curricula
/ Curriculum Design
/ Curriculum development
/ Emotions
/ Feedback
/ Graduate students
/ Higher education
/ Knowledge
/ Knowledge base
/ Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)
/ Learning
/ Negative emotions
/ Research design
/ Research methodology
/ Social & emotional learning
/ Soliciting
/ Student participation
/ Students
/ Teaching
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Curriculum design for social, cognitive and emotional engagement in Knowledge Building
by
Raman Preeti
, Slotta Jim
, Xing Wanli
, Zhu Gaoxia
in
Cognition
/ College students
/ Colleges & universities
/ Course Content
/ Curricula
/ Curriculum Design
/ Curriculum development
/ Emotions
/ Feedback
/ Graduate students
/ Higher education
/ Knowledge
/ Knowledge base
/ Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)
/ Learning
/ Negative emotions
/ Research design
/ Research methodology
/ Social & emotional learning
/ Soliciting
/ Student participation
/ Students
/ Teaching
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Curriculum design for social, cognitive and emotional engagement in Knowledge Building
Journal Article
Curriculum design for social, cognitive and emotional engagement in Knowledge Building
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Knowledge Building has been advanced as a pedagogy of engaged learning where students identify as a community whose purpose is to advance their shared ideas. This approach, which has been studied for three decades (Scardamalia & Bereiter, in: K. Sawyer (ed) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, Cambridge University Press, 2014), includes cognitive, social constructivist, and emotional elements (Zhu et al. in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 29: 789–820, 2019b). This paper investigates how refining Knowledge Building activities based on students’ feedback impacts their social, cognitive, and emotional engagement. Using a design-based research method, we refined successive course activities based on feedback from 23 Masters of Education students. With successive iterations, we found that the density of students’ reading networks increased; they theorized more deeply, introduced more authoritative resources, and made greater efforts to integrate ideas within the community knowledge base. As well, their level of negative affect decreased. These findings suggest that soliciting students’ input into course design can benefit their engagement and disposition toward learning, with implications for curriculum design.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.