Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Reconciling validity and challenges of patient comfort and understanding: Guidelines to patient‐oriented questionnaires
by
Sabourin, Véronique
, Ramsden, Vivian R.
, Chouinard, Maud‐Christine
, Howse, Dana
, Hudon, Catherine
, Danish, Alya
, Lambert, Mireille
, Cassidy, Monique
, Rubenstein, Donna
, Doucet, Shelley
, Bisson, Mathieu
, Dumont‐Samson, Olivier
, Schwarz, Charlotte
, Porter, Judy
in
Action research
/ Chronic illnesses
/ Comfort
/ Comorbidity
/ Data collection
/ Governance
/ Guidelines
/ Health education
/ Health literacy
/ Health research
/ Health services
/ Innovations
/ Institutes
/ Medical research
/ Medicine, Experimental
/ Mental disorders
/ Mental health
/ Original
/ Participant observation
/ Participatory action research
/ Patient communication
/ patient engagement
/ Patient satisfaction
/ Patient-centered care
/ Patients
/ patient‐reported outcome measure
/ Primary care
/ Property
/ Quality of life
/ Quantitative psychology
/ questionnaire
/ Questionnaires
/ Research design
/ Surveys
/ Teams
/ Validity
/ Vulnerable Populations Special
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Reconciling validity and challenges of patient comfort and understanding: Guidelines to patient‐oriented questionnaires
by
Sabourin, Véronique
, Ramsden, Vivian R.
, Chouinard, Maud‐Christine
, Howse, Dana
, Hudon, Catherine
, Danish, Alya
, Lambert, Mireille
, Cassidy, Monique
, Rubenstein, Donna
, Doucet, Shelley
, Bisson, Mathieu
, Dumont‐Samson, Olivier
, Schwarz, Charlotte
, Porter, Judy
in
Action research
/ Chronic illnesses
/ Comfort
/ Comorbidity
/ Data collection
/ Governance
/ Guidelines
/ Health education
/ Health literacy
/ Health research
/ Health services
/ Innovations
/ Institutes
/ Medical research
/ Medicine, Experimental
/ Mental disorders
/ Mental health
/ Original
/ Participant observation
/ Participatory action research
/ Patient communication
/ patient engagement
/ Patient satisfaction
/ Patient-centered care
/ Patients
/ patient‐reported outcome measure
/ Primary care
/ Property
/ Quality of life
/ Quantitative psychology
/ questionnaire
/ Questionnaires
/ Research design
/ Surveys
/ Teams
/ Validity
/ Vulnerable Populations Special
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Reconciling validity and challenges of patient comfort and understanding: Guidelines to patient‐oriented questionnaires
by
Sabourin, Véronique
, Ramsden, Vivian R.
, Chouinard, Maud‐Christine
, Howse, Dana
, Hudon, Catherine
, Danish, Alya
, Lambert, Mireille
, Cassidy, Monique
, Rubenstein, Donna
, Doucet, Shelley
, Bisson, Mathieu
, Dumont‐Samson, Olivier
, Schwarz, Charlotte
, Porter, Judy
in
Action research
/ Chronic illnesses
/ Comfort
/ Comorbidity
/ Data collection
/ Governance
/ Guidelines
/ Health education
/ Health literacy
/ Health research
/ Health services
/ Innovations
/ Institutes
/ Medical research
/ Medicine, Experimental
/ Mental disorders
/ Mental health
/ Original
/ Participant observation
/ Participatory action research
/ Patient communication
/ patient engagement
/ Patient satisfaction
/ Patient-centered care
/ Patients
/ patient‐reported outcome measure
/ Primary care
/ Property
/ Quality of life
/ Quantitative psychology
/ questionnaire
/ Questionnaires
/ Research design
/ Surveys
/ Teams
/ Validity
/ Vulnerable Populations Special
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Reconciling validity and challenges of patient comfort and understanding: Guidelines to patient‐oriented questionnaires
Journal Article
Reconciling validity and challenges of patient comfort and understanding: Guidelines to patient‐oriented questionnaires
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely recognized as important tools for achieving a patient‐centred approach in health research. While PROMs are subject to several stages of validation during development, even questionnaires with robust psychometric properties may challenge patient comfort and understanding. Aim Building on the experience of patient engagement in the PriCARE research programme, this paper outlines the team's response to concerns raised by patient partners regarding the administration of the questionnaire. Methods Based on a participatory action research design and the patient engagement framework in the Strategy for Patient‐Oriented Research of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, PriCARE team members worked together to discuss concerns, review the questionnaires and come up with solutions. Data were collected through participant observation of team meetings. Results This paper demonstrates how patient partners were engaged in PriCARE and integrated into the programme's governance structure, focusing on the challenges that they raised regarding the questionnaires and how these were addressed by PriCARE team members in a six‐step approach: (1) Recognizing patient partner concerns, discussing concerns and reframing the challenges; (2) Detailing and sharing evidence of the validity of the questionnaires; (3) Evaluating potential solutions; (4) Searching the literature for guidelines; (5) Creating guidelines; and (6) Sharing and refining guidelines. Conclusion This six‐step approach demonstrates how research teams can integrate patient partners as equal members, develop meaningful collaboration through recognition of individual experiences and expertise and ensure that the patient perspective is taken into consideration in research and healthcare innovation. Patient or Public Contribution All patient partners from the PriCARE programme were actively involved in the six‐step approach. They were also involved in the preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc,Wiley
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.