Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
How General Is Trust in \Most People\? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
How General Is Trust in \Most People\? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem
Do you wish to request the book?
How General Is Trust in \Most People\? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
How General Is Trust in \Most People\? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem
2011
Overview
Generalized trust has become a paramount topic throughout the social sciences, in its own right and as the key civic component of social capital. To date, cross-national research relies on the standard question: \"Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you need to be very careful in dealing with people?\" Yet the radius problem—that is, how wide a circle of others respondents imagine as \"most people\"—makes comparisons between individuals and countries problematic. Until now, much about the radius problem has been speculation, but data for 51 countries from the latest World Values Survey make it possible to estimate how wide the trust radius actually is. We do this by relating responses to the standard trust question to a new battery of items that measures in-group and out-group trust. In 41 out of 51 countries, \"most people\" in the standard question predominantly connotes out-groupes. To this extent, it is a valid measure of general trust in others. Nevertheless, the radius of \"most people\" varies considerably across countries; it is substantially narrower in Confucian countries and wider in wealthy countries. Some country rankings on trust thus change dramatically when the standard question is replaced by a radius-adjusted trust score. In cross-country regressions, the radius of trust matters for civic attitudes and behaviors because the assumed civic nature of trust depends on a wide radius.
