Journal Article

Detecting frail, older adults and identifying their strengths: results of a mixed-methods study

Fret, Bram, van der Vorst, Anne, Van der Elst, Michaël, Lambotte, Deborah, Engelborghs, Sebastiaan, Smetcoren, An-Sofie, Hoeyberghs, Lieve, Schols, Jos, De Lepeleire, Jan, De Witte, Nico, De Donder, Liesbeth, Schoenmakers, Birgitte, Zijlstra, G.A. Rixt, Verté, Dominique, De Deyn, Peter Paul, Dury, Sarah, Duppen, Daan, De Roeck, Ellen, Dierckx, Eva, Kempen, Gertrudis, Kardol, Tinie

2018

Overview

Background The debate on frailty in later life focuses primarily on deficits and their associations with adverse (health) outcomes. In addition to deficits, it may also be important to consider the abilities and resources of older adults. This study was designed to gain insights into the lived experiences of frailty among older adults to determine which strengths can balance the deficits that affect frailty. Methods Data from 121 potentially frail community-dwelling older adults in Flemish-speaking Region of Belgium and Brussels were collected using a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected using the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and numeric rating scales (NRS) for quality of life (QoL), care and support, meaning in life, and mastery. Bivariate analyses, paired samples t-tests and means were performed. Qualitative data on experiences of frailty, frailty balance, QoL, care and support, meaning in life, and mastery were collected using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were subjected to thematic content analysis. Results The “no to mild frailty” group had higher QoL, care and support, meaning in life, and mastery scores than the “severe frailty” group. Nevertheless, qualitative results indicate that, despite being classified as frail, many older adults experienced high levels of QoL, care and support, meaning in life, and mastery. Respondents mentioned multiple balancing factors for frailty, comprising individual-level circumstances (e.g., personality traits, coping strategies, resilience), environmental influences (e.g., caregivers, neighborhood, social participation), and macro-level features (e.g., health literacy, adequate financial compensation). Respondents also highlighted that life changes affected their frailty balance, including changes in health, finances, personal relationships, and living situation. Conclusion The findings indicate that frailty among older individuals can be considered as a dynamic state and, regardless of frailty, balancing factors are important in maintaining a good QoL. The study investigated not only the deficits, but also the abilities, and resources of frail, older adults. Public policymakers and healthcare organizations are encouraged to include these abilities, supplementary or even complementary to the usual focus on deficits.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Adults / Aged / Aging / Analysis / Biostatistics / Bivariate analysis / Caregivers / Cognitive ability / Content analysis / Empowerment / Environmental Health / Environmental impact / Epidemiology / Frail elderly / Frailty / Health / Health aspects / Health behavior / Health education / Health literacy / health promotion and society / Identification methods / Independent living / Institutionalization / Intervention / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Methods / Mixed methods research / Mortality / Neighborhoods / Older people / Physiological aspects / Public Health / Qualitative analysis / Qualitative research / Quality of life / Research Article / Social participation / Studies / Systematic review / Vaccine