Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A controlled study of personalized versus standard osteotomy in medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A controlled study of personalized versus standard osteotomy in medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis
Do you wish to request the book?
A controlled study of personalized versus standard osteotomy in medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A controlled study of personalized versus standard osteotomy in medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis
2025
Overview
Purpose
To compare the efficacy of personalized osteotomies with that of standard osteotomies in treating medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis.
Methods
The clinical data of 96 patients who were diagnosed with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in our group between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively analysed on the basis of preoperative and postoperative radiological measurements. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), forgotten joint score (FJS), and Lysholm knee score scale (Lysholm) were used to assess the clinical outcome, and complications were observed and recorded.
Results
According to the relevant criteria, 84 of 96 patients were included in this study. All patients were followed for a mean of 31 (range 22–55) months. Fifty-one patients underwent personalized osteotomy procedures, and thirty-three underwent standard osteotomy procedures. The postoperative KOOS Pain (
P
< 0.0001), KOOS Symptoms (
P
< 0.0001), KOOS ADL (
P
< 0.0001), KOOS Sport (
P
= 0.0023), KOOS QoL (
P
< 0.0001), Lysholm (
P
< 0.0001) and FJS (
P
< 0.0001) scores were higher than those in the standard osteotomy group. Nevertheless, postoperative extension (
P
= 0.2636) and postoperative flexion (
P
= 0.3554) were not significantly different.
Conclusion
This was a single-centre, retrospective, short follow-up study with several limitations. However, on the basis of the results of the present study, we believe that the function of the knee after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) is affected by the direction of tibial osteotomy. We believe that better clinical results may be obtained when the tibial implant is placed near the preoperative tibial deformity.
Level of evidence
:
Level IV; retrospective case series.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
