Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
Do you wish to request the book?
Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
2023
Overview
In the present work, the potential benefit of using multi-cumulative trapping headspace extraction was explored by comparing the results using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coated with divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane and a probe-like tool coated with polydimethylsiloxane. The efficiency of a single 30-min extraction, already explored in previous work, was compared with that of multiple shorter extractions. We evaluated three different conditions, i.e., three repeated extractions for 10 min each from different sample vials (for both the probe-like tool and SPME) or from the same vial (for SPME) containing brewed coffee. The entire study was performed using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The two-dimensional plots were aligned and integrated using a tile-sum approach before any statistical analysis. A detailed comparison of all the tested conditions was performed on a set of 25 targeted compounds. Although a single 30-min extraction using the probe-like tool provided a significantly higher compound intensity than SPME single extraction, the use of multiple shorter extractions with SPME showed similar results. However, multiple extractions with the probe-like tool showed a greater increase in the number of extracted compounds. Furthermore, an untargeted cross-sample comparison was performed to evaluate the ability of the two tested tools and the different extraction procedures in differentiating between espresso-brewed coffee samples obtained from capsules made of different packaging materials (i.e., compostable capsules, aluminum capsules, aluminum multilayer pack). The highest explained variance was obtained using the probe-like tool and multiple extractions (91.6% compared to 83.9% of the single extraction); nevertheless, SPME multiple extractions showed similar results with 88.3% of variance explained.
Graphical Abstract
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer,Springer Nature B.V,Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
/ Aroma
/ Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
/ Chemistry and Materials Science
/ Chimie
/ Coffee
/ comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography
/ HiSorb
/ Methods
/ Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
/ Multi-cumulative trapping (MCT)
/ Multidimensional comprehensive gas chromatography (GC × GC)
/ Odors
/ Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences
/ Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre
/ Sciences des denrées alimentaires
/ Solid-phase microextraction (SPME)
/ Variance
