Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Modeling sediment diagenesis processes on riverbed to better quantify aquatic carbon fluxes and stocks in a small watershed of the Mid-Atlantic region
by
Zhang, Xuesong
, Lee, Sangchul
, Moglen, Glenn E
, Junyu, Qi
, McCarty, Gregory W
, Wu, Yiping
in
Aquatic ecosystems
/ Aquatic environment
/ Carbon
/ Carbon cycle
/ Carbon dioxide
/ Computer simulation
/ Deposition
/ Diagenesis
/ Dissolved organic carbon
/ Fluvial sediments
/ Fluxes
/ Model testing
/ Parameter sensitivity
/ River beds
/ River networks
/ Sediments
/ Sensitivity analysis
/ Water circulation
/ Water column
/ Watersheds
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Modeling sediment diagenesis processes on riverbed to better quantify aquatic carbon fluxes and stocks in a small watershed of the Mid-Atlantic region
by
Zhang, Xuesong
, Lee, Sangchul
, Moglen, Glenn E
, Junyu, Qi
, McCarty, Gregory W
, Wu, Yiping
in
Aquatic ecosystems
/ Aquatic environment
/ Carbon
/ Carbon cycle
/ Carbon dioxide
/ Computer simulation
/ Deposition
/ Diagenesis
/ Dissolved organic carbon
/ Fluvial sediments
/ Fluxes
/ Model testing
/ Parameter sensitivity
/ River beds
/ River networks
/ Sediments
/ Sensitivity analysis
/ Water circulation
/ Water column
/ Watersheds
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Modeling sediment diagenesis processes on riverbed to better quantify aquatic carbon fluxes and stocks in a small watershed of the Mid-Atlantic region
by
Zhang, Xuesong
, Lee, Sangchul
, Moglen, Glenn E
, Junyu, Qi
, McCarty, Gregory W
, Wu, Yiping
in
Aquatic ecosystems
/ Aquatic environment
/ Carbon
/ Carbon cycle
/ Carbon dioxide
/ Computer simulation
/ Deposition
/ Diagenesis
/ Dissolved organic carbon
/ Fluvial sediments
/ Fluxes
/ Model testing
/ Parameter sensitivity
/ River beds
/ River networks
/ Sediments
/ Sensitivity analysis
/ Water circulation
/ Water column
/ Watersheds
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Modeling sediment diagenesis processes on riverbed to better quantify aquatic carbon fluxes and stocks in a small watershed of the Mid-Atlantic region
Journal Article
Modeling sediment diagenesis processes on riverbed to better quantify aquatic carbon fluxes and stocks in a small watershed of the Mid-Atlantic region
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundDespite the widely recognized importance of aquatic processes for bridging gaps in the global carbon cycle, there is still a lack of understanding of the role of riverbed processes for carbon flows and stocks in aquatic environments. Here, we added a sediment diagenesis and sediment carbon (C) resuspension module into the SWAT-C model and tested it for simulating both particulate organic C (POC) and dissolved organic C (DOC) fluxes using 4 years of monthly observations (2014–2017) in the Tuckahoe watershed (TW) in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region.ResultsSensitivity analyses show that parameters that regulate POC deposition in river networks are more sensitive than those that determine C resuspension from sediments. Further analyses indicate that allochthonous contributions to POC and DOC are about 36.6 and 46 kgC ha−1 year−1, respectively, while autochthonous contributions are less than 0.72 kgC ha−1 year−1 for both POC and DOC (less than 2% of allochthonous sources). The net deposition of POC on the riverbed (i.e., 11.4 kgC ha−1 year−1) retained ca. 31% of terrestrial inputs of POC. In addition, average annual buried C was 0.34 kgC ha−1 year−1, accounting for only 1% of terrestrial POC inputs or 3% of net POC deposition. The results indicate that about 79% of deposited organic C was converted to inorganic C (CH4 and CO2) in the sediment and eventually released into the overlying water column.ConclusionThis study serves as an exploratory study on estimation of C fluxes from terrestrial to aquatic environments at the watershed scale. We demonstrated capabilities of the SWAT-C model to simulate C cycling from uplands to riverine ecosystems and estimated C sinks and sources in aquatic environments. Overall, the results highlight the importance of including carbon cycle dynamics within the riverbed in order to accurately estimate aquatic carbon fluxes and stocks. The new capabilities of SWAT-C are expected to serve as a useful tool to account for those processes in watershed C balance assessment.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.