Journal Article

The effectiveness of the Structured Health Intervention For Truckers (SHIFT): a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT)

Brookes, Cassandra L., King, James A., Edwardson, Charlotte L., Varela-Mato, Veronica, Clemes, Stacy A., Troughton, Jacqui, Yates, Thomas, Bodicoat, Danielle H., Gray, Laura J., Sherry, Aron, Chen, Yu-Ling, Johnson, Vicki, Munir, Fehmidah, Paine, Nicola J., Richardson, Gerry, Sayyah, Mohsen, Di Paola, Ana Suazo, Guest, Amber J., Ruettger, Katharina

2022

Overview

Background Long distance heavy goods vehicle (HGV) drivers exhibit higher than nationally representative rates of obesity, and obesity-related co-morbidities, and are underserved in terms of health promotion initiatives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the multicomponent ‘Structured Health Intervention For Truckers’ (SHIFT), compared to usual care, at 6- and 16–18-month follow-up. Methods We conducted a two-arm cluster RCT in transport sites throughout the Midlands, UK. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, at 6- and 16–18-month follow-up. Clusters were randomised (1:1) following baseline measurements to either the SHIFT arm or usual practice control arm. The 6-month SHIFT programme included a group-based interactive 6-h education and behaviour change session, health coach support and equipment provision (Fitbit® and resistance bands/balls to facilitate a ‘cab workout’). The primary outcome was device-assessed physical activity (mean steps/day) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included the following: device-assessed sitting, physical activity intensity and sleep; cardiometabolic health, diet, mental wellbeing and work-related psychosocial variables. Data were analysed using mixed-effect linear regression models using a complete-case population. Results Three hundred eighty-two HGV drivers (mean ± SD age: 48.4 ± 9.4 years, BMI: 30.4 ± 5.1 kg/m 2 , 99% male) were recruited across 25 clusters (sites) and randomised into either the SHIFT (12 clusters, n  = 183) or control (13 clusters, n  = 199) arms. At 6 months, 209 (55%) participants provided primary outcome data. Significant differences in mean daily steps were found between groups, in favour of the SHIFT arm (adjusted mean difference: 1008 steps/day, 95% CI: 145–1871, p  = 0.022). Favourable differences were also seen in the SHIFT group, relative to the control group, in time spent sitting (− 24 mins/day, 95% CI: − 43 to − 6), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (6 mins/day, 95% CI: 0.3–11). Differences were not maintained at 16–18 months. No differences were observed between groups in the other secondary outcomes at either follow-up. Conclusions The SHIFT programme led to a potentially clinically meaningful difference in daily steps, between trial arms, at 6 months. Whilst the longer-term impact is unclear, the programme offers potential to be incorporated into driver training courses to promote activity in this at-risk, underserved and hard-to-reach essential occupational group. Trial registration ISRCTN10483894 (date registered: 01/03/2017)

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Adult / Aging / Biomedicine / Clinical trials / Clusters / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Diabetes / Diet / Education / Evaluation / Exercise / Female / Health aspects / Health behavior / Health Promotion / Humans / Interactive control / Intervention / Lifestyles / Logistics / Male / Medical screening / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Methods / Middle Aged / Obesity / Obesity - epidemiology / Obesity - prevention & control / Occupational drivers / Physical activity / Physical fitness / Regression analysis / Regression models / Research Article / Sedentary behavior / Sedentary behaviour / Text messaging / Truck drivers / Workforce / Working hours / Workplace